英语交流 今日: 0|主题: 2699|排名: 51 

最后发表： pipiluu99
回复内容：

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：
大学网站上应该有联系方式，并可以找到一些答案

最后发表： lyle_w
回复内容：
I've never been so much  missing the ages living  in the bungalow    ??

【平房大院】翻译成bungalow ？上网查好像怎么翻译的都有，I would go with:  traditional Chinese style villa / courtyard

最后发表： nini5118
回复内容：
有朋友想申请莫纳什大学的翻译学院的研究生，想要口语方向的，不知有了解这个学院和专业的吗？容易读吗？谢谢

最后发表： thewall
回复内容：
silicone table mat?

最后发表： wangbo
回复内容：

俯卧撑是撑起自己的重量，这个和绝对份量没法同类比较，有的人很重，做不了几个俯卧撑，但是可能卧推能比你推的重

最后发表： bijou
回复内容：
看来中介还是不靠谱，多亏有这个论坛，多谢指点，好好研究一下

最后发表： 苏丝红
回复内容：
樓主都用“他”或“她”，不用“我”

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：


Just read the word YAK somewhere today, saying English borrowed many words from other languages and yak was one of those and it's from Tibetan.

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：
Good job.
another one, mould / mold

最后发表： WTE
回复内容：
Wisdom Tree Education (原名English Solution Centre) 成立于2008年,是墨尔本最专业的教育补习机构之一。自成立以来,有超过500多名的学生在WTE的帮助下,顺利考入理想的精英高中,或在VCE考试中取得优秀成绩并顺利考取志愿学校,或取得全额奖学金,或是顺利通过雅思考试,取得永久居住权。

WTE为1到12学年的学生提供英语、数学、物理和化学等补习课程。WTE也为所有的学生提供SAT、TOEFL、雅思、General English、中文和韩国语等多样化课程。WTE所有的教材均为自制且拥有版权; 所有讲师都拥有多年教学经验并经过资格认证。

联系WTE,您会发现教育，可以有所不同。

地址：Unit 103-104, 975 Whitehorse Road，Box Hill VIC 3128
电话： (03) 9899 9927
手机： 0452 213 532
网址: http://wisdomtree.net.au
邮箱: info@wisdomtree.net.au

最后发表： xincheng
回复内容：
呵呵，昨晚收到了ATO的信，让我补交一千多的税呢。别人的事情咱管不着，反正自己对得起自己良心就是了。

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：
Try other boards, please. Likely get an answer there.

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：
了解好多澳土著人的历史，土著人的参观点以及他们对学生的教育，土著人写的诗词
有时会对比这些存在已久的族落，也会想，澳土著和美印第安真是backward - 没多少发展，几千年不变的生活方式
另一方面说， 什么是发展呢？ 就是消耗资源尤其是不可再造资源, 文明的同义词就是占有; 先文明化的族群由于发展而带出环境资源问题。
澳土著人说
We don't own the land, the land own us. The land is my mother, we are part of the land.

最后发表： Serin
回复内容：
直译就是：在你本次澳大利亚居住时期开始，就已经是单亲家长了。

最后发表： 宇宙航空
回复内容：
怎么没有第三阶段和第四阶段呢？

最后发表： yearshappy
回复内容：

听说过从Web进去的，该是有的，只是我从没关注过
我自己是从藤讯网站下载的 英语版本 http://www.imqq.com/download/

最后发表： shadowave
回复内容：
这个现发真是有很趣啊！

最后发表： sophia39
回复内容：
C~5V^B

最后发表： MICHELLE07
回复内容：

Dear please don't waste your time translating them
We were joking
Thanks..............

最后发表： yisheng_honger
回复内容：
赶紧学习

最后发表： liluliang
回复内容：
Hi <your_name>,

Well folks, it’s been a pretty awesome ride.  And we sure had some lulz, didn’t we?  But the time has finally come for me to bid farewell.  After a long process of deliberation, I’ve decided to leave the profession and become a XXXX.  

I want to sincerely thank everyone for making my time at COMPANY enjoyable and rewarding, and I wish you and COMPANY all the best.

If anyone would like to stay in contact (and please do!), here’s my personal email:

XXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com

Cheers,
XXX XXXX

最后发表： dorolam
回复内容：
看晚上6点7号台的新闻，然后Today Tonight，然后7点ABC的新闻，最后7点半ABC2的Specks and Spicks。

最后发表： liuxujim
回复内容：
墨尔本考的雅思最快知道成绩的方式是啥？
http://results.ielts.org/ 最早第几天后公布成绩？有可能提前么？

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：
有那么重要吗？

最后发表： 西澳海豚
回复内容：
Six Ways Obama Talks About War Without Saying “War”
Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2013/0 ... -war/#ixzz2er3d5EuI




The rousing rhetoric of a wartime speech is one thing. Trying to explain what the U.S. might do in Syria is quite another, a rhetorical puzzle that Obama’s administration has been trying to piece together for the war-weary American people. In six interviews last night, Obama walked a thin line trying to explain what, exactly, the U.S. should do when another country crosses a red line.

Here are six rules the President and many of his aides seem to be following when it comes to talking about war that isn’t war.

Don’t use the word “war,” of course.

There has long been a stockpile of euphemisms for actions or threats that involve making war, in the dictionary sense of “the employment of armed forces against a foreign power”: any necessary means, regime change, ultimate defense, humanitarian intervention, grave consequences—all options being on the table. In his interviews last night, Obama repeatedly referred to “military action” and even euphemized “military action” as “a significant piece of business” in an interview with PBS. “Everybody knows if you send in Tomahawk missiles and you’ve got the fleet sitting off the coast, those are war-like actions,” says Ken Khachigian, a former speechwriter for Nixon and the chief speechwriter for Reagan. Still, he says, “I wouldn’t say ‘we’re going to war’.”

Talk about what it is by saying what it isn’t.

Whatever the U.S. does in Syria, Obama reiterated last night, will not involve “boots on the ground.” It will not include “sustained airstrikes.” It will not amount to being involved in the “entire Syrian conflict.” The “sectarian civil way in Syria” is one thing, and what the U.S. does is another. He said America will not “embroil” itself. It will not be “long term.” And it will not be “costly.” This military action will not amount to “a military engagement” or “some large-scale invasion,” that would morph into a “slippery slope.” And it certainly wouldn’t be anything like other slippery slopes America has been trying to climb in the Middle East, he said, or “even Libya.”

Say the target is a group of things.   

Obama’s language suggested that the U.S., unlike Bashar Assad, would not really be taking action against human beings. A military strike in Syria is different than one in Iraq or Afghanistan, he implied, because this is a fight against the use of things. His plan is for the U.S. to strike “Assad’s capabilities,” to execute a “set of strikes to degrade his chemical weapons capabilities,” to “deal with this chemical weapons issue.” Our foes in his words are nouns that will never live or breath. “There’s a lot of clinical language that gets used when you’re speaking about the actions taken by your own side,” says former Clinton speechwriter Jeff Shesol. “Your language gets a little looser when you’re speaking about the other.”

Make it sound small.

Secretary of State John Kerry likely went too far yesterday when he said that military action would be “unbelievably small.” As Shesol says, “It starts to sound at a certain point like protesting too much.” But Obama used keywords last night to suggest that, if war was a duel to the death, military action in Syria will be more of a glove to the face demanding satisfaction. He used the word limited no fewer than 10 times, and words like narrow. He repeatedly used the word proportional. What exactly is proportional to a foreign leader’s use of chemical weapons on his own citizens is up for debate, but proportional action implicitly rules out widespread destruction or anything that would be big enough, in theory, to justify another round of retaliation.

Make it sound precise.

The word Obama used last night most often in reference to chemical weapons and why most all of humanity opposes them was indiscriminate. So he emphasized that military action taken by the U.S. would be the opposite of blind slaughter. It would instead be discriminate and “very specific” in a “targeted,” even “surgical,” way. When Obama wasn’t referring to military “action,” he referred to military “strikes,” which also sound much more distinct than bombings or even the use of missiles. Weapons are chaotic; a strike is like an organized bolt of lightning. “They really want people to understand how contained this operation is going to be,” says Shesol. “[A limited strike] sounds very clean. It sounds very technical.”

But make it sound serious.

When NBC’s Savannah Guthrie interviewed Obama yesterday, she said the notion of “limited and consequential” strikes seemed almost a contradiction in terms. But if the U.S. is taking action, Obama has to make it sound like that action will be big and bad enough not only to deter Assad from using chemical weapons and to avenge the death of Syrian innocents, but to dissuade all other malefactors in the world from ever using chemical weapons again. So Obama repeatedly emphasized that military action would be “significant,” and that “the U.S. does not do pinpricks”—even if the U.S. does do small, surgical, limited, targeted strikes against weaponry and other things.

最后发表： 浮云云艾米莉
回复内容：
这么一说似乎想起，这个词确实似乎n年没用过了。。。

最后发表： jgpyjwc
回复内容：
直接打断
我以前也想怎么和人聊天
时间长了 我想说就说   不想说就不说 没刻意滴

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：

没有吧,我觉得我说话很正常

最后发表： 唧唧歪歪
回复内容：
想起那句"名言"：...水平不知道比你们高到哪里去了，我跟它谈笑风生，你们啊，图样图森破。

最后发表： 浮云云艾米莉
回复内容：

貌似没有

最后发表： 沙燕
回复内容：
真好，先收藏，谢谢分享。

最后发表： ms44
回复内容：
I have the same question and hope you can give us more information about your experiences after you do the whole thing.

最后发表： allbbsid
回复内容：
同问，有 redneck 的无线电对谈的链接吗？

最后发表： yping88
回复内容：
The following is an email from me to one of my colleagues who had operaton done, I was supposed to be serious about it. But we had been joking about each other for too long for me to keep straight face with her.

Dear Mary,

It is nice of you to keep us up-dated on your progress.

I was very pleased to be advised that it's your home-day today, so that you can keep John (John is the husband) on his toes by pressing the buzzer all the time. I suggest you to do it after midnight, if he doesn't answer it, you feel free to press the emergency one to get his urgent attention.

Ok, all the jokes aside, have you got any pain? please tell me where the pain is, does it go anywhere else? Anything you do to aggravate it or alleviate it? What is the pain score from 0-10? Do you need any morphine? If not, I strongly recommend heaps of cuddles and kisses from John. If that doesn't help you, come and see us next monday, more consultation will be coming up then!

Seriously, please take care and have a speedy recovery!

Love,

最后发表： happycory
回复内容：
收藏了，，太有用了

最后发表： happycory
回复内容：
Mark,,绝对好东东

最后发表： cherry血
回复内容：
喜欢看在线的推荐在网易公开课看，有app，收的还比较全，TED也有，不过网易有一点很糟糕的就是经常会把字幕组的成果变成他们自己的……

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：

已经装好2007版本，哈哈！