|
本帖最后由 yping88 于 21-12-2013 14:40 编辑
Frankly, I am not sure about the idea of talking about this incident from the racism point of view, no matter how much some people intended to, because there was no sign or remarks suggesting that discrimination against some race was involved.
I would rather look at this incident from an approach that directs at "Negligence of duty of care" "Paying all lives with respect"!
As a police officer, he/she should be held accountable for anyone who is taken into his/her custody, that is why we call it "Custody". Whenever this word is involved, "A duty of care" is automatically put in operation, those who operates the custody should take on the guardianship in protecting the receptor's safety and human rights.
whoever enters a profession should be professionally competent to perform his/her healthily in his/her job. That means, the professionals should be non-judgemental, fair and non-discriminant. No matter who he/she is dealing with, they should be treated as equal, as a human being at all times, even though they are alcoholics, drug dealers/users or even murderers.
So, when Mr Tang stated he needed medical assistance, he should have had that service in place on request rather than ignored just because he was regarded being drunk and talking nonsenses. When he was crawling out of his cell, the officers should have been striken by the question "Why a man chose to loss all his dignity as a human being and crawled like an animal?". If this question crossed the officers' mind even briefly, they would have noticed something really went terribly wrong with Mr Tang.
Therefore, whenever the prejudice against certain group (in this case I am talking about the alcoholic group) takes its role, the professionals would loss the sense of professionalism, loss the competency to make sound judgements, loss the sense of duty of care and fail themselves as the qualified professionals as they should be!
What a huge disgrace had been shown in the police force in this case! |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|