|
|
ozbird 发表于 26-7-2013 11:54
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biotechnology/index_en.htm
欧盟有关转基因食物的官方网站。
I think this article is quite reasonable from point view of management. If there is a new finding that raises the concerns, there should have a defined way to manage it.
And the direct reason might be some new findings that happened on lab mouses not human beings.
http://www.infowars.com/europe-w ... nking-it-to-cancer/
for this research, there were different opinion on panels of scientists, including EFSA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gen ... _food_controversies
"In 2007, 2009, and 2011 Gilles-Eric Seralini published re-analysis studies that used data from Monsanto rat feeding experiments for three GM maize varieties (insect resistant MON 863 and MON 810, and the glyphosate resistance NK603). He concluded that they had actually caused liver, kidney, and heart damage in the rats.[103][104][105] The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the data and concluded that the small differences were all within the normal range for control rats.[106] The EFSA review also stated that the statistical methods used were incorrect.[107][108][109] The EFSA conclusions were supported by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ),[110][111][112] a panel of toxicologists funded by Monsanto[113] and the French High Council of Biotechnologies Scientific Committee (HCB).[114]"
The only reason why France and other government activated this clause based on a research that were disagreed by other more credible institutes, that I could image is, politics, but no more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A9ralini_affair
"The Séralini affair began in September 2012, and involved the publication and publicization of the results of experiments conducted by Gilles-Eric Séralini, which were then confuted by the scientific community"
|
|
楼主: ashanadsl
[复制链接]
发表于 26-7-2013 12:54:45
