找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 2469|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创天地] 作文求批,看看斤两

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 31-10-2010 16:07:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
上次雅思不行跑题,痛苦二鸭中。大家觉得能得几分呢?More families send their children to studyabroad. Discuss advantage & disadvantage. What age do you recommend?


Education can always attract publicattention, for it is closely connected with children’s future. Nowadays, moreand more parents encourage their children to study abroad after graduation fromhigh schools or universities. I will discuss the pros and cons in this essay.


Studying abroad brings plenty ofopportunities for children to improve themselves. First of all, it is universalacknowledged that a good language atmosphere brings numerous positive effectsfor learning the second language. If there is no chance to speak their nativelanguage, they will speak the second language all the time. Besides,undoubtedly, children become much more independent when they live and study inanother country without any help from their parents. For instance, they startto learn how to do the housework, how to communicate with landlord and how toschedule their time.


On the other hand, new environment brings avariety of challenges to children. Children, probably, will be confronted withan enormous culture shock at the very beginning, especially, for those maturestudents. Normally, the shock will last for a long time until they fully adaptto the new environment. In addition, it is cost a lot of money to send childrento study abroad. For those middle-income families, it becomes an essentialaspect that need to be considered carefully. Is it really needed to spend allthe money, including the parents’ pensions, to provide an opportunity offurther education abroad to their children?



Inconclusion, I suppose that sending children to study abroad is a correct decision,but the parents should take the family financial situation into consideration.Last but not the least, do not send children to study abroad when they are tooyoung. Personally, I think that when children are 15 years of age or above,parents can consider whether send them to study abroad.
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 31-10-2010 22:32:12 | 只看该作者
there is no point in the first paragraph...
看不下去了。
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 31-10-2010 22:35:27 | 只看该作者
我靠,绝对的中式英文
请高手指点
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 1-11-2010 18:13:07 | 只看该作者
现在不谈英文,中式英文也好,英式中文也好,你就按中文写出来,你那能拿的出手啊,东扯西拉,中文小学三年级水平都不够哇。

一针见血,楼主想拍砖就拍吧。
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 1-11-2010 18:23:06 | 只看该作者
有人批了第一段,我看了下最后一段。
1,英语写作,逗号后面要空一格再写下一句的开始,否则看着很不舒服。
2,每一句都有连词,lz应该学习过雅思写作,蛮好的啊。
3,有语法错误。
.
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 1-11-2010 19:40:30 | 只看该作者
我们就先批批作文的第一句话
中式英文加废话
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 1-11-2010 22:25:51 | 只看该作者
----------------Education can always attract publicattention, for it is closely connected with children’s future.
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 1-11-2010 22:37:15 | 只看该作者
搂住写的不错,,应该有6分
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 1-11-2010 22:39:02 | 只看该作者

回复 #8 七仙女 的帖子

你拍的好温柔啊
回复  

使用道具 举报

10#
 楼主| 发表于 3-11-2010 21:18:34 | 只看该作者
顶。继续寻拍砖。这开头还是我抄的某篇范文。大家一般都怎么开头呢。
回复  

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 3-11-2010 21:20:44 | 只看该作者

回复 #2 nil 的帖子

什么叫no point?还望明确一点说。是指没有观点,还是这个开头太过迂腐了。
水平实在有限,坛友多包涵,多多之处意见,不怕板砖。
回复  

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 4-11-2010 00:11:52 | 只看该作者

回复 #11 mrface 的帖子

give a clear statement (your point) in the first paragraph.  I don't think this is a good model you've copied.  

400 words essay, there is no time and space for you to set puzzles for your reader--your marker, in fact.  They've read thousands of rubbish essays.  I reckon no one would like playing a guessing game after these--better give them your articulate idea at the very beginning, then prove it.

At least, to me, your beginning is boring enough to stop me reading through your essay.
回复  

使用道具 举报

13#
 楼主| 发表于 4-11-2010 00:31:16 | 只看该作者

回复 #12 nil 的帖子

有道理,不过第一段作为引题很难写的很出彩。也有人说一个简短的开头段也非常不错,不用扯背景和一些无关的话。直接点题,表观点。然后跟主体段。不知道鸭友么更中意什么风格
回复  

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 4-11-2010 12:35:04 | 只看该作者

回复 #13 mrface 的帖子

well.  I don't think what other testees think matters.  Rather, the tester's opinion is more important, since they are the ones reading your essay.  As you've said, 400-word essay is nothing--the shortest at uni is 1000 based.  So I reckon a CLEARLY STATED paragraph is good enough--at least you let the marker know what you are going to argue/support.  This is called deductive method, or top-down.  You don't want to make your listener confused after you blah blah a lot.

BTW, background is necessary--but don't get it too far.  As to me, there is a huge information gap between your first sentence and second sentence, as you jump from A directly to W--which is not well constructed.  English is not YOU KNOW, I KNOW stuff.  Rather, it is I KNOW and I EXPLAIN based on my idea about YOUR BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE.  Always keep your reader in your mind--are they the knowledge receivers, or actually higher than you.  To the former, you've got to explain more; otherwise they don't get your point.  To the latter, don't bullshit too much--they will think you take them as fools.

As for the language, you've got to work hard enough to improve.  Basically, language is a self-studying thing.

Hope these help.
回复  

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 7-11-2010 06:58:40 | 只看该作者
Education is always the key concern of Chinese
这样表达怎样,用attract感觉别扭
回复  

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 7-11-2010 09:33:04 | 只看该作者
很好很强大,很多词有用错现象。

pros & cons是缩写,请你写作的时候不要用,如果要用就用全称。
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 9-2-2025 06:06 , Processed in 0.050148 second(s), 31 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表