找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 665|回复: 0

大作文再求拍(3wu等人有空给看看)

[复制链接]
发表于 19-9-2010 15:39:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
It is wrong that our government pays more money to the artist projects, for instance, there are more and more paintings and sculptures appearing at the public places, because there are more important things to do. What is your opinion?
==========================================================================================================

It is common to see vast number of artificial projects like paintings as well as sculptures when people is wandering urban streets, and it has caused heated argument recently. Some people believe our government has invested too much in them, and there are some more important areas that are still weak and needs improvements with the investment. Personally, it is worthy to allocate appropriate proportion of overall governmental incomes to those artist projects.

There are multiple reasons why I believe that it is worthy to strengthen artificial items. Out of the multiple reasons, the obvious one should be that the artist items not only help improving the urban scenes, but also promote the cultural diversity. On the other hand, it also helps increasing the opportunities in job market since those projects need more human powers to fulfill. Last but not least, the artificial items might introduce more incomes for local authorities regarding the reality that the vast number of those items become tourist attractions. All the factors mentioned above are telling us that artificial projects are worthy for being invested in.

On the other hand, it is not denied that the minority of governments have spent too much on artist projects. According to a survey released recently, there are 10% of urban governments have allocated 20%, or even more of their overall incomes to those projects, that was regards as being inappropriate from my personal view since there are still more important areas, which are related to our daily life as well, needs more investments.

In conclusion, I do believe that it is worthy to put appropriate proportion of incomes to artist projects, but the governments also need think about other important areas like education, traffic system, social security etc. It might be the qualified development of society to have a balanced one.
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 14-7-2020 15:38 , Processed in 0.052723 second(s), 16 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表