找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 645|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

我的作文,帮忙看看

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 8-9-2008 00:32:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
Should experiments be conducted on animals for the benefit of human being?

Many new medicines and medical treatment have been invented in 20 century, and millions people life have been saved by them. No thing is more important than people’s life and health. Therefore, no invention has received more praise than available medicines. At the same time, there is no denying the fact that animals contributed their life and health in medical test to save human’s. However, in quit a few countries any efforts to restrict the right of animals are rightly condemned , and what is more, some people debate to ban the animal medical test. Is it reasonable?

Those who insist on ban the animal medical test argue for animal’s right like ours. In fact, since human being existed in the world, animals have always been accompanying us over thousands years. We raise and eat them and let them worked as tools. No country ban to eat animal’s meat in modern society. Could you image to eat people’s ? The word justice is usually associated with different people. Raising animals leads to use and they can’t enjoy human’s rights. Animals such as rabbits which are used in experiments can be easily raised and most counties set standards for animal treatment in tests to prevent cruelty. They have their dignity in tests.

Another reason why I advocate animal tests is that at present there are no other better methods to replace them. we are only at the beginning of a development that man-made medical test based on computer and this hope is always in the realms of science fiction. That is to say, animal tests are still regarded as the only reliable and feasible method.

After understanding the reasoning above, it’s quite safe now to say: to choose animal medical test is a wise action. It would be much more cruel to let people die because there is not enough information about a disease from medical test.
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 8-9-2008 02:33:42 | 只看该作者
Many new medicines and medical treatment(复数) have been invented in (加the)20 century, and millions (加of)people(加's) life have been saved by them. No thing is more important than people’s life and health. Therefore, no invention has received more praise than available medicines. At the same time, there is no denying the fact that animals contributed their life(复数) and health in medical test(复数) to save human’s. However, in quit a few countries any efforts to restrict the right of animals are rightly condemned , and what is more, some people debate to ban the animal medical test. Is it reasonable?
开头就要表面立场观点, 最后来一句反问,有点奇怪.

Those who insist on ban(用名词) the animal medical test argue for animal’s right(复数)  like ours. In fact(这个词不对), since human being existed(过去式?) in the world, animals have always been accompanying us over thousands years. We raise and eat them and let them worked as tools. No country ban(主谓一致?) to eat animal’s meat in modern society. Could you image(用imgine比较好吧) to eat people’s ? The word justice is usually associated with different people. Raising animals leads to use and they can’t enjoy human’s rights. Animals such as rabbits which are used in experiments can be easily raised and most counties set standards for animal treatment in tests to prevent cruelty. They have their dignity in tests.
说实话,这段没有看懂, 不知道为何要跑出来一个说吃人....最后的意思就是如果动物很多就可以随便搞了--如果手段正确.

Another reason why I advocate animal tests is that at present there are no other better methods to replace them. we are only at the beginning of a development that man-made medical test based on computer and this hope is always in the realms of science fiction. That is to say, animal tests are still regarded as the only reliable and feasible method.


After understanding the reasoning above, it’s quite safe now to say: to choose animal medical test is a wise action. It would be much more cruel to let people die because there is not enough information about a disease from medical test.
看完最后一段总算有点明白了, 人可以吃动物, 人可以对动物作实验了, 同样人不可以吃人, 这样人对人直接作实验就不人道了.
略微看了下:
汗, 语法错误好多, 建议贴上来先把语法错误改了. and用的好多, 用and的时候另外起一个句子, 不要老打逗号, 如果不是联系很紧密的不要用了.  很多中文写作习惯. 开始观点不明确.论证很无力,
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 8-9-2008 11:34:28 | 只看该作者
我是5分水平,感觉这个文章能到4.5~5分
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 3-1-2025 22:21 , Processed in 0.029734 second(s), 18 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表