数码天地 今日: 0|主题: 4756|排名: 52 

最后发表： cndpan
回复内容：
itunes 的app 默认就是保存在下面这个目录中：
我的文档\My Music\iTunes\iTunes Media\Mobile Applications  

备份这个目录就可以了。

最后发表： Dreamhouse
回复内容：
In Hong Kong

unlimited -- HKD 450 a month
iphone 32G -- HKD 580
contract --2 years

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cheap

最后发表： ubuntuhk
回复内容：
Templates应该就是模板，Flyer中文是传单、宣传单张的意思，王姐用的是哪个软件？是PowerPoint吗？

最后发表： ubuntuhk
回复内容：
搭地铁还要用GPS吗？

在地铁/轨道交通发达的城市，迷路时，找到任何一个地铁入口就是找到方向了。

最后发表： sucewang
回复内容：
        昨天我上TAFE计算机课程时学习了模板的功能，这里TAFE使用的电脑都是很新的版本，DAVI老师告诉我们先点击File（文件）-New（新建）-Templates（模板）-Flyer（？）然后选择自己需要的图片种类，比如我可以点击invitation（邀请）然后选择里面的图片，我都学会了。我们这的TAFE使用的电脑全部是英文，电脑没有下载中文。学习后回到家里，我用自己的电脑使用Templates（模板）时找不到对应的中文。
        请教IT行业的朋友给以指教！

最后发表： Dreamhouse
回复内容：
我也要进入时髦了

科技最不灵光的我
被白色的iphone深深打动了

呵呵呵

最后发表： combread
回复内容：
楼主穿越了……以为这是天朝呢？买苹果还得加钱？

最后发表： bio
回复内容：
一般是中招的表现

最后发表： zhengbear
回复内容：
或者有没有对这行感兴趣的兄弟，我们可以交流下。hehe

最后发表： mollyoz
回复内容：
Jobs,我的偶像，你可要挺住，我还没跳槽去Apple呢。

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：
great staff

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：

最后发表： 我爱猫眯
回复内容：

最后发表： lihuaiq
回复内容：
因为改用有线上网，打算低价处理掉原来买的无线猫，是3G的E160G白色款。有意的朋友可电话联系我，0420 852 276

最后发表： jinglin08
回复内容：
哈 同道中人嘛 我也在台服玩  准备去悉尼了  时差3小时吧？ 你怎么玩啊

最后发表： rocky.
回复内容：

呵呵，说实话，我刚开始用的，容量还很多。呵呵。我给了直接注册的链接了，可以不用我推荐的链接的。

[ 本帖最后由 rocky. 于 22-4-2011 20:33 编辑 ]

最后发表： cien98
回复内容：
哈哈，有这么疯狂啊。

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：
never mind, fixed

最后发表： 李大锤
回复内容：
下个pqmagic，可以解决你的问题。不过一定要慎重，稍有失误你的资料瞬间全毁，后果自负啊，别告诉我没提醒你。

最后发表： NEWGAY
回复内容：
要是我，我就把抛尸地点写成linux彩蛋，藏到代码中

最后发表： jpvltxk
回复内容：


这个真是个好建议，但我之前没有用过这个东东。能不能推荐几款比较好用的？ 希望能在php和mysql环境中使用。先谢了。

最后发表： jpvltxk
回复内容：
有tz参加过这个展缆吗，来评论一下。

我在网上看了一下介绍，好象基本上是如何移动办公。

最后发表： coredump
回复内容：
想法（ideas）没有用：性欲和爱的故事
from TechCrunch中文站 by truant1 person liked this - you

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

大家经常说，好的想法 + 好的执行 = 好的创业公司，当然，这是个合理的总结，但是好的创业公司所包含的真实成分，不只是 50% 好的想法，你知道为什么吗？
想法没有用。
想法无处不在，每天涌进我们的脑海中，想法并不是点燃我们成为创业企业家的那一丝星火，我们只需要他们中的一个，而其他的都没有用，只会成为使我们分心的噪音。
我每天都听到新想法，通常是来自那些富有激情的开发者，这些想法就像公共汽车一样，一次来3辆，但是这些想法通常被市场规模、进入壁垒、团队资源、现金流等难倒，想法更倾向于是那种没有经过深思熟虑，没有物质基础昙花一现的商业建议。
想法没有用。
在我加入 HackFwd 之前，我有太多的想法，每天从其中一个，跳到另一个，我可能会整晚的思考、素描、吸烟、写代码、设计直到第二天太阳升起。我想的越多，就觉得想法和性欲有相同的特点，你整晚都在想，但是过了一会，你疲倦了，就放下了，然后下一个想法进来，你重新兴奋起来…再过一会…又疲倦，又放下，就这样不停地循 环往复。
用愿景替代想法
从特点上来说，愿景更像是爱（与性欲相比），你需要花时间去实现它。是一种你需要去培育，随着你投入越来越多获得就越来越多的东西，愿景是那种你每一个醒着的时刻都会想着的东西，可笑复杂，美丽优雅，简单，真实。愿景可以给你真正的信心和希望。
我的建议是：每一个追寻想法的人，都应该选择最好的一个，娶她，不离不弃，尽快开始发展愿景。
想法没有用，
愿景才有用。
好的想法 + 好的执行 = 好的创业公司
愿景 + 制造愿景的人 = 成功。

最后发表： usiha
回复内容：
这一网捞的蛮深的

最后发表： 老林
回复内容：


我用的是旧版本的金山词霸（2006）.

最后发表： bg1pdq
回复内容：
我经常用人人网。

最后发表： MacroJ
回复内容：
鬼打鬼

最后发表： 李大锤
回复内容：
98-2003年用过，曾经很痴迷一些大牛的components，后来淡出了delphi圈子。

最后发表： 不方便
回复内容：
萝卜青菜，各有所爱，作为一个普通用户，眼前爽就行了，长远就留给苹果公司的战略高层去想了。

最后发表： 江南柴进
回复内容：
Because they are almost apposite: Apple
and_________________________Adobe                        

Just kidding;) Please read the letter from Jobs:


Apple has a long relationship with Adobe. In fact, we met Adobe’s founders when they were in their proverbial garage. Apple was their first big customer, adopting their Postscript language for our new Laserwriter printer. Apple invested in Adobe and owned around 20% of the company for many years. The two companies worked closely together to pioneer desktop publishing and there were many good times. Since that golden era, the companies have grown apart. Apple went through its near death experience, and Adobe was drawn to the corporate market with their Acrobat products. Today the two companies still work together to serve their joint creative customers – Mac users buy around half of Adobe’s Creative Suite products – but beyond that there are few joint interests.

I wanted to jot down some of our thoughts on Adobe’s Flash products so that customers and critics may better understand why we do not allow Flash on iPhones, iPods and iPads. Adobe has characterized our decision as being primarily business driven – they say we want to protect our App Store – but in reality it is based on technology issues. Adobe claims that we are a closed system, and that Flash is open, but in fact the opposite is true. Let me explain.

First, there’s “Open”.

Adobe’s Flash products are 100% proprietary. They are only available from Adobe, and Adobe has sole authority as to their future enhancement, pricing, etc. While Adobe’s Flash products are widely available, this does not mean they are open, since they are controlled entirely by Adobe and available only from Adobe. By almost any definition, Flash is a closed system.

Apple has many proprietary products too. Though the operating system for the iPhone, iPod and iPad is proprietary, we strongly believe that all standards pertaining to the web should be open. Rather than use Flash, Apple has adopted HTML5, CSS and JavaScript – all open standards. Apple’s mobile devices all ship with high performance, low power implementations of these open standards. HTML5, the new web standard that has been adopted by Apple, Google and many others, lets web developers create advanced graphics, typography, animations and transitions without relying on third party browser plug-ins (like Flash). HTML5 is completely open and controlled by a standards committee, of which Apple is a member.

Apple even creates open standards for the web. For example, Apple began with a small open source project and created WebKit, a complete open-source HTML5 rendering engine that is the heart of the Safari web browser used in all our products. WebKit has been widely adopted. Google uses it for Android’s browser, Palm uses it, Nokia uses it, and RIM (Blackberry) has announced they will use it too. Almost every smartphone web browser other than Microsoft’s uses WebKit. By making its WebKit technology open, Apple has set the standard for mobile web browsers.

Second, there’s the “full web”.

Adobe has repeatedly said that Apple mobile devices cannot access “the full web” because 75% of video on the web is in Flash. What they don’t say is that almost all this video is also available in a more modern format, H.264, and viewable on iPhones, iPods and iPads. YouTube, with an estimated 40% of the web’s video, shines in an app bundled on all Apple mobile devices, with the iPad offering perhaps the best YouTube discovery and viewing experience ever. Add to this video from Vimeo, Netflix, Facebook, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, ESPN, NPR, Time, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Sports Illustrated, People, National Geographic, and many, many others. iPhone, iPod and iPad users aren’t missing much video.

Another Adobe claim is that Apple devices cannot play Flash games. This is true. Fortunately, there are over 50,000 games and entertainment titles on the App Store, and many of them are free. There are more games and entertainment titles available for iPhone, iPod and iPad than for any other platform in the world.

Third, there’s reliability, security and performance.

Symantec recently highlighted Flash for having one of the worst security records in 2009. We also know first hand that Flash is the number one reason Macs crash. We have been working with Adobe to fix these problems, but they have persisted for several years now. We don’t want to reduce the reliability and security of our iPhones, iPods and iPads by adding Flash.

In addition, Flash has not performed well on mobile devices. We have routinely asked Adobe to show us Flash performing well on a mobile device, any mobile device, for a few years now. We have never seen it. Adobe publicly said that Flash would ship on a smartphone in early 2009, then the second half of 2009, then the first half of 2010, and now they say the second half of 2010. We think it will eventually ship, but we’re glad we didn’t hold our breath. Who knows how it will perform?

Fourth, there’s battery life.

To achieve long battery life when playing video, mobile devices must decode the video in hardware; decoding it in software uses too much power. Many of the chips used in modern mobile devices contain a decoder called H.264 – an industry standard that is used in every Blu-ray DVD player and has been adopted by Apple, Google (YouTube), Vimeo, Netflix and many other companies.

Although Flash has recently added support for H.264, the video on almost all Flash websites currently requires an older generation decoder that is not implemented in mobile chips and must be run in software. The difference is striking: on an iPhone, for example, H.264 videos play for up to 10 hours, while videos decoded in software play for less than 5 hours before the battery is fully drained.

When websites re-encode their videos using H.264, they can offer them without using Flash at all. They play perfectly in browsers like Apple’s Safari and Google’s Chrome without any plugins whatsoever, and look great on iPhones, iPods and iPads.

Fifth, there’s Touch.

Flash was designed for PCs using mice, not for touch screens using fingers. For example, many Flash websites rely on “rollovers”, which pop up menus or other elements when the mouse arrow hovers over a specific spot. Apple’s revolutionary multi-touch interface doesn’t use a mouse, and there is no concept of a rollover. Most Flash websites will need to be rewritten to support touch-based devices. If developers need to rewrite their Flash websites, why not use modern technologies like HTML5, CSS and JavaScript?

Even if iPhones, iPods and iPads ran Flash, it would not solve the problem that most Flash websites need to be rewritten to support touch-based devices.

Sixth, the most important reason.

Besides the fact that Flash is closed and proprietary, has major technical drawbacks, and doesn’t support touch based devices, there is an even more important reason we do not allow Flash on iPhones, iPods and iPads. We have discussed the downsides of using Flash to play video and interactive content from websites, but Adobe also wants developers to adopt Flash to create apps that run on our mobile devices.

We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform. If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools, they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available to our developers.

This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms. Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available on our competitor’s platforms.

Flash is a cross platform development tool. It is not Adobe’s goal to help developers write the best iPhone, iPod and iPad apps. It is their goal to help developers write cross platform apps. And Adobe has been painfully slow to adopt enhancements to Apple’s platforms. For example, although Mac OS X has been shipping for almost 10 years now, Adobe just adopted it fully (Cocoa) two weeks ago when they shipped CS5. Adobe was the last major third party developer to fully adopt Mac OS X.

Our motivation is simple – we want to provide the most advanced and innovative platform to our developers, and we want them to stand directly on the shoulders of this platform and create the best apps the world has ever seen. We want to continually enhance the platform so developers can create even more amazing, powerful, fun and useful applications. Everyone wins – we sell more devices because we have the best apps, developers reach a wider and wider audience and customer base, and users are continually delighted by the best and broadest selection of apps on any platform.

Conclusions.

Flash was created during the PC era – for PCs and mice. Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs. But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short.

The avalanche of media outlets offering their content for Apple’s mobile devices demonstrates that Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any kind of web content. And the 250,000 apps on Apple’s App Store proves that Flash isn’t necessary for tens of thousands of developers to create graphically rich applications, including games.

New open standards created in the mobile era, such as HTML5, will win on mobile devices (and PCs too). Perhaps Adobe should focus more on creating great HTML5 tools for the future, and less on criticizing Apple for leaving the past behind.

Steve Jobs
April, 2010

最后发表： NoChoice
回复内容：
1. 都差不多，主要只有几个营运商Telstra, Optus, Vodafone，其它都是分销商，覆盖最好当然是telstra,当然价格也最贵，其次是optus，我用virginmobile
2。 3g usb只有optus和vodafone能通用，telstra的不能通用，他们用的频段不一样，都是wcdma，和国内的联通一个技术
3。 3g一般使用hsdpa,下行理论最大7.2mbps，一般是512kbps， 打voip绝对没有问题
4。 pennytel, mynetfone, engine都不错，pennytel，最便宜，8c一个打国内，不限时间

码了这么多字，也该多加点分了吧

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
bing也有字典，google那个一般

最后发表： fjfzly
回复内容：
You need to install Itune,then the computer will install iphone drive for computer.after that you will find your iphone icone in your computer

最后发表： Ray和Wendy
回复内容：
领分来了

最后发表： MacroJ
回复内容：
厉害厉害～

不过我家的IPTV速度超慢，最后还是转回用流量的那些播放器了

最后发表： peetoo
回复内容：
在把家里配置最高的笔记本插在电视上1个月之后（因为只有这个本子有HDMI接口），觉得有必要在电视旁边放个电脑了。一开始是看到了MAC mini之后有了这个念头，后来发现还有HTPC这个东东。

但是MAC mini还是有点贵，dell的zino HD也不错，价格也不是贵的离谱。但是不知道该买个什么配置的，设想的应用场景：
1）日常上网
2）看高清电影（蓝光光驱是否必要，不知现在蓝光的普及程度如何）
3）家庭的存储中心。家里好几台电脑，n多移动硬盘，找点东西麻烦死了。
4）下载机
本来还想用来玩3D游戏的，毕竟在电视屏幕上玩游戏比20几寸的小液晶爽多了，但看了一些测评后还是放弃了这个念头。

想请教各位，满足以上几点的情况下，什么样的配置比较好，而且几年内都不会不够用

最后发表： 西澳海豚
回复内容：
我有一個同事, 想架一個網站, 供人上傳音樂並在網路上銷售
不知道有人有意願接這個case?
如果有興趣談細節,請自行上他的facebook留言
Tony 'Shane' Sinclair
我完全不介入, 也不干涉任何事項,請諒解----

最后发表： bg1pdq
回复内容：
没排队，在 apple 官网订了一台。等 2-3 weeks 吧。咳....

最后发表： ubuntuhk
回复内容：
确实是这样，个体户折腾点硬件开发不容易啊，模具、研发、加工费用、售后，每一个环节都相当考研人。

最后发表： chubbycat
回复内容：
iPad 2全球售价各有差别：美国最低 丹麦最贵
       
Local Access打往中国电话卡1.3￠/分种
       
        文章来源: 广州日报 于 2011-04-06 07:44:26
敬请注意:新闻取自各大新闻媒体，新闻内容并不代表本网立场！        
       

“我托出差澳大利亚的同事购买一部iPad 2，发现最低配置的都要579澳元(568美元)，折算一下近4000元人民币，不划算，直接买第一代iPad好过它。”日前，果粉Wing表示，即便到国外买行货(进入国内即为水货)，价格也似乎没有美国的便宜，如果过关再征收1000元的关税，那就更高成本了。事实上，3月25日iPad 2在全球上市(日本因地震推迟发售)，售价差别明显，美国价格最低而丹麦最贵。因此，要去国外买的玩家，不妨比较之后，选择性价比较高的国家购买。


　　美国价格最低丹麦最贵

　　据路透社报道，苹果iPad 2于3月25日在美国海外25个国家上市，不过均高于美国本土售价。苹果最早3月11日起在美国销售iPad 2，基本款(WIFI版16GB)售价499美元，而同款在丹麦售价高达702美元。据悉，无论是欧洲还是亚洲的苹果迷在当地的苹果店外排起长龙，很多人甚至彻夜排队抢购。

　　由于iPad 2在中国香港尚未正式发售，有商家经由美国购买的iPad 2加价至1.5万港元(1，900美元)出售。

　　在美国，各州销售税介于0~13.725%不等，基本款最终售价最高为567美元，平均为547美元。在欧元区多数国家，iPad 2基本款售价为479欧元(678美元)，其中法国稍贵489欧元，卢森堡稍便宜。iPad 2在英国售价则低于欧洲大陆，为399英镑(642美元)。

　　分析师预计，iPad 2在美国发售的首个周末可能已售出约100万台，但许多分析师警告称，尚不清楚日本发生地震和海啸后，货源紧张会对消费者的购买产生什么样的影响。

　　本地水货超5500元

　　代购较便宜


　　火爆的iPad 2因价格各地不同，差别较大，因而一定程度上限制了国内用户的购买欲望。“价格高，而且只是轻和薄一些，功能上与第一代iPad没有实质区别，还是买第一代好了。”Wing的看法代表了相当大一部分人。由于亚太地区日本没有销售，只有澳大利亚了。有网友算了一笔账，找人代购按最便宜的算 579×6.6=3824，就算3850元，运费估计300左右，也要4150元。若通过邮寄被抽检到，关税可能500~1000元，则等于4650。基本上，最少都要4500元。

　　因此，目前广州水货价格一般超过5500元。也就是在代购4500元的基础上加价1000元。记者了解到，这一价格已经受4月香港将销售iPad 2消息的影响，否则会更高。此前，苹果透露，iPad 2将于4月登陆中国香港、新加坡、韩国等地，但具体日期没有透露。并且，中国内地的上市时间，仍然没有任何消息。

　　据港媒报道，ipad2将于4月11日在香港上市。如果参照苹果此前所说的iPad 2与第一代iPad最初上市价格保持一致的说法，iPad 2登陆香港后WIFI版16G、32G、64G的市场报价应该分别为3888元港元、4688元港元和5488元港元，同时具有3G上网功能的则各加 1000元港元。