公正：怎样做才正确（哈佛大学公开课 阅读连载）- 第一讲：杀人的道德侧面/同类自残案

funnybird

Along the line of the discussion, what if the cabin boy, Richard Parker, was dead already. Would it be okay to consume his body to survive? If you believe the cannibalism is morally absolutely wrong, would you go on starving to death? And the sailor, Brooks, maybe he didn't participate and consent to kill Parker, but does consuming the boy's body later on in order to survive makes him morally correct or makes his act legal? The lecture reminds me of a real story that in a plane crash in South America where the survivors had to rely on eating corpse to go on waiting for rescue...

More food for thought...

lisa2008

原帖由 funnybird 于 18-1-2011 13:46 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

it's because they lack of the patience and are always looking for the short-cut. With the short-cuts, you might get a good score in some tests. But in real life, true progress is only made when you read and think arduously. Read and learn, patience pays!

very true

frozen_heart770

这版 Justice 不是Michael Sandel 在 哈佛讲的么？

lisa2008

哈，这个演讲的确是哈佛Michael S的那个。已经改过来了

Options

The complicated topics really demond texts... and time...

Options

The value of philosophy is to make ourselves clear, to inflect which we are accustomed to and find the solutions by ourselves . Actually I haven't put this topic in my priority list and now I can't stop. trying to find the texts for lesson 2.

[ 本帖最后由 Options 于 1-2-2011 19:39 编辑 ]

Freda2007

如果对哈佛、耶鲁等大学的公开课有兴趣，还可以登录http://v.163.com/open，这个上面的课是配有中英文字幕的。

cocobai

ding..........................................

Waynegu

A wise person said, a smart person only invests his energy and time into normal things.
Another wise person said, a real good doctor always cures the sickness before it happens.
In this case, I learnt the importance of pre-check before driving, and I don't understand why so many people like to study the extremly situation.