|
倒不是说语法的问题,概念有点乱啊
This is a meeting regarding torts and Negligent Misstatement.
A tort is a civil wrong in common law jurisdiction which causes someone else's loss or injuries.
[In contrast, negligent misstatement must be proven on the balance of probabilities. ] - 这里不对啊,torts 也是要prove on the balance of probabilities. 而且negligent misstatement 的定义也没有出来。
A relevant case of Negligent Misstatement is Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1987) in which initially the auditors were found to be negligent, yet they are not negligent due to a recession which broke the chain of causation. - 这里也不对。initially found to be negligent, 是lower court finding 么?然后higher court 推翻了?如果是不同的court要说清楚。可以说 in which the auditors were found to be negligent in the court of xxx. But the High Court overturned the previous decision and found the auditors to be not negligent on the basis that the chain of causation was broken by the recession.
以下这段要附上一个跟negligent misstatement 有关系的新闻:
Refer to one legal action in an Australian Court that has been reported in the newspaper. Attached herewith a printed copy for your perusal. - 这个直接说refer to an Australian case on this issue. Attached is a printed copy for your review.
Lastly, in accordance with the compliance requirements, staff should regularly check the website below to keep updated with the legislation regulating negligent misstatement and small business.
Please follow the link below:
http://www.treasury.gov.au/Polic ... bility/Misstatement
Should you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ext 121.
Kind regards
xxxxx |
|