找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 1642|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[language study] 帮忙挑挑错

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 22-2-2009 16:42:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
Should Firecrackers Be Banned
     There is no denying the fact that it is a hotly debated topic whether firecrackers should be banned. Some people hold the view that there are a lot of advantages for both adults and child involved in setting off firecrackers. For one thing, providing a better atmosphere of festivals and holiday occasions, the firecracker is playing an important role during the spring festival, the national festival and the like. For another, playing various firecrackers can reduce people’s stress of life and work.
     However, others object to firecrackers. The poor quality of firecrackers can bring about the fire accident. In recent years, there has been a marked growth of fire accidents brought about by firecrackers. At the same time, with poor sense of safety, more and more people are injured by the firecracker. In addition, the cost of firecrackers is very high to most Chinese consumers.
     For my part, playing firecrackers can do a lot more good than bad as long as the government can strengthen quality supervision of firecrackers and people improve their safety awareness.



麻烦啦
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
 楼主| 发表于 22-2-2009 16:43:23 | 只看该作者
麻烦啦 谢谢啦
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 22-2-2009 17:46:56 | 只看该作者
楼主你又来了.....

字数不够,大作文不写完规定的两百五十个字,甭指望上6分的。估计你还差50几个字吧,你一直是惜墨如金的说啊。

开头不要和正方观点连在一块儿,分行写。child用复数children, set off firecrackers-不知道放鞭炮是否是这个说法,可以用play with firecrackers吗?鞭炮之所以是重要角色,你可以在后面补充说明:in ancient chinese period, firecrackers were made in huge quantities,people had them in order to drive away wickedness and met gods,in particular in spring festival,playing with firecrackers has been one of chinese traditional culture,这样论据就有了,字数也上去了。反方论证里,accidents brought about by firecrackers---bring about用了两次了,可以用caused替换。但后面没有看见具体论据啊,你可以举例,今年北京的新电视大楼被花炮烧掉了外壳,人员伤亡,a firefighter died in that awful accident…领导很生气,outcome was very terrible,没准儿考官一看见这个有力论据,他一感兴趣,少扣你0.5分,呵呵,而且字数也上去了。还有,为啥不提atmosphere pollution and garbage cleaning呢?noise pollution你也漏了吧,可以继续展开论证。   

结尾没啥改的。

[ 本帖最后由 jlcgydzq 于 22-2-2009 18:08 编辑 ]

评分

参与人数 2威望 +45 收起 理由
vivi0905 + 30 谢谢指点
唯有KH + 15 谢谢你的修改,很用启发的说

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 23-2-2009 02:27:41 | 只看该作者
用的模版 我都看出来了 ^_^  ls的厉害 像你学习!
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 23-2-2009 17:08:06 | 只看该作者

回复 #4 sotmaomao 的帖子

烦人
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 23-2-2009 17:20:06 | 只看该作者
字数上面的建议:举例,举例,举例!

你把央视烧掉大裤衩的例子写上去就起码多100字了

评分

参与人数 1威望 +15 收起 理由
唯有KH + 15 谢谢

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 11-3-2025 09:16 , Processed in 0.024907 second(s), 22 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表