邻居同人 今日: 0|主题: 1703|排名: 30 

最后发表： 我无聊
回复内容：
女博士跳楼自杀事件；女博士跳楼自杀 丈夫为掩盖自己是同性恋者骗婚：在此前后，当自己同性恋身份被发现后，程某发短信向罗洪玲道歉：“我就是个王八蛋，不值得你伤心”。6月14日，罗洪玲首次向母亲透露了离婚事宜。当晚，程某通过微博向罗洪玲公开道歉：罗老师，对不起，我就是个gay。是我骗了你，骗婚目的就是为了掩盖自己。

惊悉自己是同妻女博士跳楼自杀

信息时报讯据《成都商报》报道，今年6月15日凌晨，成都某高校外国语学院韩语教师、刚考取博士研究生的罗洪玲，从一座公寓的13楼坠下，当场身亡。作为“同妻”（男同性恋者的妻子）中的一员，她的死亡引起关注。日前，成都武侯公安分局官方微博“平安武侯”正式发布：系自杀无疑，已排除为刑事案件。

自杀前丈夫承认是gay

6月15日，罗洪玲自杀的当天，罗洪玲的家人、同事、同学和朋友，纷纷赶到望江路派出所。下午，她的丈夫程某做完笔录出来。当时至少有七八个人把程某围在中间。程某当众表达了两点：1.他和罗洪玲因为自己的性取向问题发生过不快；2.他婚后曾出轨两次。

出事前晚两人发生了什么，程某说两人无争吵，一切很正常。

罗洪玲去世后，亲友们找出她晋江论坛的账号。6月13日，罗洪玲在“晋江论坛”发帖：“姐妹们是对的。我丈夫是一个gay，从头到尾，都在骗我。”

在此前后，当自己同性恋身份被发现后，程某发短信向罗洪玲道歉：“我就是个王八蛋，不值得你伤心”。6月14日，罗洪玲首次向母亲透露了离婚事宜。当晚，程某通过微博向罗洪玲公开道歉：罗老师，对不起，我就是个gay。是我骗了你，骗婚目的就是为了掩盖自己。

6月15日凌晨3时过，罗洪玲发出最后微博：“这个世界真叫人疲倦，那么就让一切都结束吧！”

两个多小时后，远在重庆的父母接到程某电话，被告知女儿坠楼。

多次网诉丈夫婚后冷淡

据亲友介绍，罗洪玲秀和丈夫程某都是重庆梁平人，两人经人介绍相识。交往五六个月后，于今年1月8日领证结婚。

婚后，罗洪玲发现程某和婚前判若两人。三个月前，罗洪玲上网吐槽说：丈夫程某白天没电话短信，下班去健身房，周末上课，还冷战。网友都称她丈夫“性取向”可能有问题。罗洪玲解释，婚前一切正常，“可以排除性取向问题”。没想到招到网友更多质疑。

5月21日早上，罗洪玲碰巧看到丈夫的手机短信，这是上海鲍姓男子发来的暧昧短信。仔细查找，手机里更多不堪入目的男同交友软件和内容。此刻她终于相信，自己深爱的丈夫是一个单纯的gay！而丈夫此前告诉她自己是双性恋。

“新婚五个月sex(性生活)，一只手数得过来。春节回成都就时常坚持分床睡。用QQ微信和各色男人勾搭，这不叫骗婚，什么才是骗婚？”她在网上的留言，显得悲愤交加。

据悉，在律师建议下，目前罗家已将罗洪玲生前的全部网络文字进行公证，其中包括程某公开道歉的那条微博，届时作起诉用。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
正因为艾滋病传播的这么严重，中国的同性恋问题才更加需要政府开始重视，消除歧视，给予同性恋平等权利！

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
　　过去，大学生同性恋者一般只愿躲在隐蔽的酒吧，或者网络的虚拟世界中进行交流。但现在，不仅有越来越多的大学生同性恋者敢于公开自己身份，他们还组成了公开的社团。而在他们的争取下，同性恋话题甚至还走入了部分大学课程。
　　记者调查发现，目前，在大学城广州十所高校中，活跃着由一群大学生同性恋者发起的拥有50多名固定成员的同性恋社团，每个月都有近200名大学生参加社团的活动。而在6年前，这个社团的成员仅有五六个。
　　最近3年，在网络、媒体宣传、校园氛围以及同学之间的影响下，同性恋的话题不再是禁忌，而是变成可以公开讨论的话题，这种进步极大依赖于社会的整体进步。　——中大性别教育论坛负责人、中文系副教授柯倩婷
　　现象
　　同性恋社团正逐渐壮大
　　近年来，随着社会宽容度越来越高，不但有越来越多的同性恋者敢于公开自己身份，组织参与各种同性恋相关社团的活动，也有越来越多的异性恋者开始理解和接受同性恋者。
　　“同性恋亲友会”于2008年在广州成立，这是一个草根公益组织，其成立目的是广泛联络国内同性恋者的亲友，帮助同性恋者的亲友更好地与他们的同性恋家人或朋友相处。刚成立第一年的第一届亲友恳谈会，其执行主任阿强也坦言找到愿意加入的同性恋者家人真是难上加难。“当时人们都很忌讳，好像不知道该找谁参加，最后只有寥寥几个同性恋者和家人来。”阿强说。
　　不过之后，亲友会不断壮大，吸引了越来越多的大学生同性恋者加入担任志愿者。阿强说，现在亲友会共有300多个志愿者，其中还有40%是异性恋者，而且大学生数量也在增多，“大概占一半”。
　　谈到这些年来最大的变化，阿强说，感觉整个社会对大学生同性恋者接受度越来越高，越来越宽容了，不会像以前那样，“听到同性恋就很惊慌”，现在也有更多的大学生、家长来参与到亲友会的活动，分享他们的故事。
　　从隐蔽交流到公开活动
　　“过去大学生同性恋者的交流渠道很有限，一般是在隐蔽的酒吧，或者网络的虚拟世界中，大家是不敢站出来公开身份，更不要说有专属于他们的公开社团组织、在课堂上谈论相关话题，甚至开设相关课程。”广州“同城”社区的志愿者Aggie说，现在，过去曾不敢想象的“不可能”都成了现实。
　　据介绍，广州“同城”社区是中国大陆第一个致力于青年学生同性恋者服务的非营利性公益机构，设于广州大学城，加入的学生大部分来自大学城乃至全市多个高校。该社区自2006年建立，但是直到2009年才建立起实体活动中心。记者看到，其官方微博现有粉丝7545人。
　　Aggie介绍，现在社区稳定保持有二三十名志愿者，志愿者中以同性恋者为多，但逐渐也有越来越多的异性恋者加入这一队伍，不时会邀请专家在高校里开设一些涉及同性恋内容、性别教育的讲座、活动等，每月举行的这些活动都有约180人次参加。
　　变化
　　社会更平等对待同性恋
　　Aggie现在是中山大学大三学生，她是一个异性恋者。成为同性恋社团的志愿者，Aggie也曾遭遇过不理解。她说自己萌发做志愿者的想法是去年暑假前，有一个有十多年交情的好朋友跟她“出柜”，那位朋友说自己从高二开始就发现自己的性取向，还曾经痛苦得想过自杀。“那时，我觉得有必要去帮助同性恋者，所以在去年5月就加入这个组织做义工。” Aggie说。
　　谈到做志愿者的收获， Aggie说，她说同性恋与异性恋并没有根本的差异，与他们做朋友跟与异性恋的人做朋友没有差别，她还学会了做人要对自己负责，要像同性恋者们一样清楚自己想要的究竟是什么，更要学会用多元化的视角看问题。“在加入‘同城’以前，我有时会说一些人‘娘娘腔’之类，也曾以为娘娘腔的都是同性恋的，其实这不一定。现在觉得这也是一种歧视。”
　　不过，阿强表示，同性恋社团活动面临的困难还是有的，例如到省外某些高校开分享会时，校方会很谨慎，有的活动甚至被取消了。更遗憾的是，阿强还是听说过外省有中学生承认自己是同性恋而被所在的高中开除。
　　区别
　　90后同性恋者顾虑少些
　　据阿强介绍，与60后、70后的同性恋者相比，出身于90后甚至95后的大学生同性恋者对自己身份的顾虑相对少一点。“这一代大学生是在互联网上成长起来的，他们在青春期就通过网络接触到更多同性恋的相关信息，而上世纪70年代生长起来的同性恋者们在成长过程中还比较难接触到此类信息。因此，现在的大学生同性恋者更敢于做自己，更真实一点”。
　　至于大学生同性恋者中的男女比例，阿强说目前并没有一个准确统计数据，但根据他的经验，男女同性恋者数量差不多，“相对而言，女同性恋者活跃度比男同性恋者要低一些，更喜欢形成‘小圈子’，相对不会过多参与社会交往。”
　　进展
　　同性恋话题进入大学课堂
　　如今同性恋已成为广东一些高校课堂上公开谈论的话题。
　　中山大学性别教育论坛负责人、中文系副教授柯倩婷表示，近十年来，社会和高校对大学生同性恋者的态度有了很大的变化。她还记得2003年，自己在中大读博时候，中大BBS有个关于同性恋的板块，但是最终也是被学校关闭了，当时觉得同性恋是一个禁忌。但到了最近3年，在网络、媒体宣传、校园氛围以及同学之间的影响下，同性恋的话题不再是禁忌，而是变成可以公开讨论的话题，这种进步极大依赖于社会的整体进步，不止在高校，在中学也开始逐渐觉得同性恋没什么好奇怪的。
　　早在2007年大学语文公选课上，柯倩婷就谈到同性恋的例子，引发了学生的共鸣。后来一个女同性恋学生还给她写信，说想不到在公选课上也能听到这种例子，发现同性恋并不是禁忌的，也是可以在课堂上自由讨论的，还询问她如何与父母沟通和是否要形式婚姻的问题，她认为老师的支持对于同性恋学生的自我确认有着极大的帮助。
　　而现在每当在课堂上谈到同性恋的话题，同学们的积极性也比之前更高，如在中大中文系宋素凤老师开的通选课《多元性别》中，也涉及同性恋的内容，学生参与投入度很高，有上百人报名。
　　Aggie介绍，在下学期广州“同城”社区将会有三个项目展开，分别是高校性别课程项目、青年活动中心项目与面向全国的“光合作用校园领导力项目”。
　　其中，高校性别课程将在中山大学、广东外语外贸大学北校区和华南师范大学开展，主要向青年大学生传达正面的性别平等观念以及多元性别观念；青年活动中心将会为大学生同性恋者提供一个交流平台；而“光合作用校园领导力”项目则是为了让更多的大学生同性恋者了解到自己的生存环境、自己能做什么，致力于改善同志的生活环境。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
香港第一位，立法会议员公开是gay。刚当选香港第五届立法会议员的陈志全，本周对媒体公开表明自己是同性恋者，表示4年任期内将提出性倾向反歧视等法案，为同志争取平等权益。40岁的陈志全曾是香港广播电视名主持，人称"慢必"，他在周日的立法会选举新界东选区作为"人民力量"成员获胜。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
法国媒体本周披露了由政府起草、预定下月提出的承认同性婚姻的法案文本，与其它一些国家类似，法国的同性婚姻不会另外有一套法律，而是修改现行婚姻法，消除对婚姻双方性别的限定，此外还将把所有相关民事法律中的"父亲"(Père)、"母亲"(mère)表述改为不论性别的"家长"(parent)。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
据美国华盛顿州支持同性婚姻团体WashingtonUnitedForMarriage.org的消息，数据存储与IT服务业跨国大公司EMC的官方9月27日声明支持华盛顿州同性婚姻法案，该法案将在11月交由全民公投(74号公投)。列《财富》500强第139位、总部不在华盛顿州的EMC重申重视工作环境的包容平等文化

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
网易体育9月14日报道：
近日有一德甲球员匿名接受了媒体的采访，在采访中他承认自己是一名同性恋，但碍于社会的巨大舆论压力因此不敢公开自己的姓名。他的言论在德国引起了轩然大波，德国媒体和德国社会都在关注这件事情的进展。在本周末的德甲联赛中，全部18支参赛球队都将穿上印有“走自己的路”字样的T恤，以此来宣扬文化包容，声援职业足球圈里的同性恋球员们。

《慕尼黑晚报》：赫内斯称迟早有球员公开出柜
德国总理默克尔表示，自己支持同性恋球员公开出柜，也希望德国整个社会都能给他们足够的理解，“所有的同性恋都和正常人一样，他们不需要为出柜感到尴尬，我们必须给他们这样的信号，那就是出柜并不是什么可怕的事情，没人会指责他们。”作为本周末德甲宣扬文化包容活动的行动大使之一，“伪球迷”默克尔将会出现在德甲联赛的赛场，现场观看多特蒙德主场迎战勒沃库森的较量。
作为德甲俱乐部的代表，拜仁主席赫内斯也表示，同性恋球员可以大胆说出事实，没有人会为难他们，“我相信，迟早会有几个球员公开出柜的，他们对现实的恐惧并不是来自于足球，足球是很开放包容的项目。如果这名球员在拜仁，我敢说拜仁已经准备好应对各种问题，他不会和球员有什么问题的。事实上，整个社会对同性恋的态度要好的多，没有媒体说的那么不堪。”
德国联赛主席劳鲍尔博士也表示，自己对同性恋球员只有尊重、没有歧视，“同性恋球员面临的种种问题我们并没有彻底解决，这我必须承认，虽然我们努力了，但收效甚微。我们必须找到一个好方法，来应对社会言论。没人可以忽视舆论的影响，但也没人可以用这样的借口来伤害德国联赛的球员。对于这位匿名出柜的球员，我对他只有尊重，他非常的勇敢。”
(本文来源：网易体育 作者：马里奥)

最后发表： townsend
回复内容：
吾只有

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
同性婚姻提案上周被澳洲众议院和参议院纷纷以绝大优势否决。
在塔斯马尼亚试图州立法，下议院通过，不过今天被上议院否决。

同志们请不要灰心，不达目的，我们誓不罢休！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
毫无疑问，澳洲人绝大多数都赞同同性婚姻。尤其是在年轻一代，知识分子阶层，和女性中，同性婚姻的赞同比例更高。
同性婚姻合法化是肯定的，目前只是一个时间问题。

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3585316.htm

最后发表： 风中藤
回复内容：

最后发表： griffith
回复内容：
从这个周日 起，就是9月30日，羽毛球改为周日 中午12点了，更多周末有时间的人可以去了

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
饭桶都不承认自己饭桶，相反，他们会说他们 Love gays，他们所做的一切都是为了同性恋好。

这种人我看多的，黑虫，莫汉，我无聊 都是不折不扣的饭桶。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
调查显示 65% 的法国人支持同性婚姻， 53% 的法国人支持同性伴侣收养， 一个支持同性婚姻立法的草案将于今年10月31日起草。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Marriage equality defeat: Where to from here?
BY DR PAULA GERBER / SEP 20, 2012 16:08PM /   / ()

DAILY newsletter
REGISTER TODAY
I wish to receive special offers via email from related companies


By submitting you agree to our Terms & Conditions
LATEST comments
READERS TALK BACK
Need a helping-hand? How to outsource your work, virtually
1 COMMENT · 7 HOURS AGO
Quit rejecting social media: Your career may depend on it
4 COMMENTS · 21 HOURS AGO
How to find time for fitness in a full schedule
6 COMMENTS · 10 HOURS AGO
Mary Robinson on becoming the first female president of Ireland: I had to have a makeover to run for president
3 COMMENTS · 2 HOURS AGO
Gillard speaks about her father, the CIA's secret weapons and more: Afternoon Agenda
1 COMMENT · 17 HOURS AGO
LATEST stories
MUST READS SITE WIDE

The work/life myth: How we’re donating 17 days a year to our employers
EDITOR'S AGENDAREAD

How leaders can build a mentoring culture
MENTORSREAD

Tales from the city: When you’re being lectured on ‘business rules’
LEADERSREAD

When Entrepreneurs become Mumpreneurs
TOP STORIESREAD

Three ways to better manage your money
PERSONAL FINANCEREAD

The 98 to 42 defeat of the Marriage Equality Bill in the House of Representatives this week has almost been overshadowed by the circus that surrounded the lead up to the vote, including Liberal Senator Cory Benardi's vile comments regarding bestiality, and Nationals Senator Ron Boswell's offensive remarks about same-sex parents.
But perhaps that is the way it should be, for there are multiple Bills relating to marriage equality in both the Federal Houses of parliament as well as at the state and territory level. The defeat of one Bill is just a minor hiccup in the unstoppable march towards marriage equality in Australia.
Our current raft of federal politicians seem to be out of touch with the views of mainstream society. Consistent polling finds that the majority of Australians support allowing same-sex couples to marry (around two thirds were in favour of marriage equality in the most recent poll). It is these figures that give marriage equality advocates confidence that change will happen, albeit not as soon as they might like.
None of the four Marriage Equality Bills at the federal level appear destined to be passed in the short term. Therefore, the best hope for marriage equality in the near future looks to be at the state or territory level. Late last month, Tasmania's Lower House passed a Marriage Equality Bill (13 to 11) which is due to be debated in the Upper House very soon. The result is likely to be a close one, with few willing to predict which way it will go. The Upper House consists of 15 senators, 13 of whom are independents, and lobbying from both sides of the debate has apparently been intense, with most members of the Legislative Council unwilling to publically disclose which way they intend to vote.
South Australia, the ACT and New South Wales are in the process of preparing similar initiatives to legalise same-sex marriage. There is no doubt that the legalisation of same-sex marriage at a state or territory level will end up in a High Court challenge which will be decided on complex constitutional law grounds about whether the Commonwealth has effectively 'covered the field' when it comes to marriage, or if the field it is seeking to regulate only heterosexual marriage. Leading constitutional law professor, George William's has expressed a qualified opinion that Tasmania's attempt to legalise same-sex marriage would likely be held to be constitutionally valid.
There is certainly precedent for countries to move towards marriage equality in a piecemeal fashion. For example in the United States, same-sex couples are allowed to marry in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia, but the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (1996) means that marriages performed in these states are not regonised by the Federal Government and each state can decide for itself whether it will recognise same-sex marriages performed in other states.
Legalising same-sex marriage on a state by state basis is less than ideal, and comes with many problems. However, if the Federal government refuses to respect the right of same-sex couples to have their relationships recognised in the same way as opposite-sex couples, namely in the secular institution of marriage, then reform at the state level is the next best option. After all, marriage is a human right, not a heterosexual privilege.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
什么？我当年可没听见，就听到他之前反对同性婚姻了，今天才同意的，希望明年美国通过。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
他提到他是一个虔诚的天主教徒，一个典型的澳洲汉子。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
对此反对党领导人艾伯特表示，联盟党在2010年大选时就承诺不会改变澳洲的婚姻法，他们不会改变自己在选举时的承诺，他说：“我们联盟党不是一个在竞选时说一套， 而在任职期反而行之的党。”

谁把这家的嘴巴给塞上，放屁太臭，泥马上！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
饭桶们已经是穷途末路了！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
什么人也不能出尔反尔啊，人品问题！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
饭桶是有后果的！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
澳洲承认其他国家的同性婚姻，所以很多同性伴侣到国外结婚。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
fingers crossed

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
没有吧？你哪里听到的？

最后发表： chubbycat
回复内容：

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/viewt ... id=15669#pid4307285

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
[youtube]nM6HTjmUG5g[/youtube]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
原文链接：
http://www.theage.com.au/nationa ... 20120919-266a8.html



Advocates will shift their focus to legalising same sex marriage at the state level, after Federal MPs yesterday voted down a bill which would have allowed gay couples to marry.

Wong vows to fight on for baby daughter

The bill, introduced by Labor backbencher Stephen Jones, was defeated in the house of representatives 98 votes to 42. Ten of the 17 Cabinet Ministers in the lower house, Green Adam Bandt and independents Andrew Wilkie, Rob Oakeshott and Craig Thomson voted for same sex marriage. All coalition MPs, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Treasurer Wayne Swan and former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd voted against the bill.

Channelling another former Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, Mr Jones urged campaigners to "maintain your rage," while the Australian Christian Lobby head Jim Wallace said it was time for the parliament to "move on."

Gay rights activists said they would now look to state and territory parliaments to make the change.
Advertisement
"Now the federal parliament has effectively brushed the wishes of a majority of Australians aside, the states and territories will take the lead, making me confident we will see same sex marriages performed somewhere in Australia by the end of the year," Australian Marriage Equality convener Alex Greenwich said.
Tasmania's lower house last month passed a bill to legalise gay marriage. It must still pass the state's 15-seat Legislative Council to become law. Efforts to legalise same sex marriage are also underway in South Australia, the ACT and New South Wales, where Premier Barry O'Farrell will allow his MPs a free vote.
UNSW law professor George Williams said state same sex marriage would be a step forward, but was not a substitute for national recognition because a marriage conducted in one state would not be recognised outside it.
Meanwhile, chief opposition whip Warren Entsch said he would consult with gay rights campaigners, opposition leader Tony Abbott and his coalition colleagues about introducing a bill for "civil partnerships," which would provide national legal recognition to both same and opposite sex couples.
The Senate is today (Thursday) expected to vote on a separate same sex marriage bill co-sponsored by Labor Senators Trish Crossin, Carol Brown, Gavin Marshall and Louise Pratt.
In debate yesterday, Finance Minister Penny Wong, whose partner Sophie Allouache gave birth to a baby girl in December, described as "hurtful" arguments by some Senators that the children of same-sex couples were worse off than those raised by heterosexual couples.
"I do not regret that our daughter has Sophie and I as parents," Senator Wong said.
"I do regret that she lives in a world where some will tell her that her family is not normal. I regret that even in this chamber, elected representatives denigrate the worth of her family. I will not rest in the face of such prejudice. I want for her, for all of us, an Australia which is inclusive and respectful, and this is why this campaign will not end here."
Openly gay Liberal Senator Dean Smith spoke against the bill, saying opinion in the gay community was divided on the issue. "By not agreeing to same sex marriage, I'm not choosing to endorse discrimination against my fellow gay and lesbian Australians, or to be disrespectful to their domestic relationships... instead for me, it's an honest acknowledgement of the special and unique characteristics of the union described as marriage," he said.
While nine Greens senators and at least 20 Labor senators are expected to vote for same-sex marriage in the Senate the bill is unlikely to receive the 39 votes it would need to pass the upper house.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/nationa ... .html#ixzz26vRN3XA5

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
这个帖子也备份一下

向虫子的道歉帖
http://freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1034429-1-1.html

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  Boswell的话，只能当笑话听听了，笑死我了。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
尽管明天注定不会通过，但是今天我们已经取得了历史性的胜利，同志们再接再厉，直到成功，我们绝不言放弃！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  Ben 是英国前橄榄球明星，已经退役，拥有很多同志球迷，他自己是异性恋，并且已经结婚生子。他的听觉有一些弱，因此也致力于改善橄榄球对有听觉障碍的人的改进。

Ben 除了公开和不遗余力的支持同性恋，还自己创办了一个凡欺凌 anti-bully的基金会。Google Ben Cochen的图片，很可爱，好多裸照啊！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Nationals Senator Ron Boswell apparently believes people should strictly adhere to stereotypical, sexist, gender roles. He just made the following outrageous, sexist, homophobic comments speaking against marriage equality in the Senate:

"There's no support for gay marriage in the Western suburbs or among blue collar workers"

"It hurts society and people haven't thought it through"

"2 mothers or 2 fathers can't raise a child properly. Who takes the boy to football? Who tells him what's right from wrong? What does he do? Go along with mum, or 2 mums? How does he go camping or fishing? It won't work, It's defying nature!"

"Once you legalize something you can't discriminate against it"

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
目前有2个联合党议员，9个绿党参议员和20个工党参议院支持同性婚姻。但是如果要同性婚姻通过立法，还需要另外9票的支持。本周晚些时候上议远投票，通过的可能性不大。

目前绿党支持同性婚姻，工党允许党员自由投票，但是联合党却禁止党员投赞同票，也就是联合党党员只能或者是弃权或者是反对。

塔斯马尼亚同性婚姻已经通过下议院，等待上议院进行投票。SA和ACT也在积极争取中。WA的同性婚姻正在等待下议院投票。

目前澳洲议会一共有4个提案等待投票，2个来自绿党，2个来自工党。







Carr supports same-sex marriage

September 17, 2012

Dan Harrison

Foreign Minister Bob Carr has declared his support of same-sex marriage. Photo: Reuters
FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr has become the latest Labor MP to declare his support for same-sex marriage.

Senator Carr, who has not made his position on the issue public until now, yesterday told The Age his support for gay marriage was consistent with the work he did as New South Wales premier to remove discrimination against gay and lesbian people from state laws. Senator Carr said that while he respected the views of those who held more conservative opinions on marriage, to him it ''seemed churlish to deny access to marriage to groups that wanted it''.

His statement comes as the Senate begins debating proposals by four Labor senators to legalise gay marriage.

While support for same-sex marriage is stronger in the Senate than in the House of Representatives, campaigners are pessimistic about the bill passing when it goes to a vote later this week.

Nine Greens senators and at least 20 Labor senators are expected to vote for change, but a further nine votes would be needed for the bill to pass. Among those yet to declare their position are Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and independent senator Nick Xenophon.

Coalition senators are bound to vote against change. While the Coalition does not expel members for voting against its position, campaigners say those who support same-sex marriage are being strongly discouraged by the leadership from voting against its position.

Australian Marriage Equality convener Alex Greenwich said if the bill was defeated, it would not be the last vote on the issue.

He said momentum for change was ''unstoppable'' and ''huge progress'' had been made since 2009, when only six senators, all from the Greens, voted for an earlier bill to legalise same-sex marriage.

''Now we are able to see how far we've got with this campaign, and how much more we need to do,'' he said.

Mr Greenwich said in the lead-up to next year's election campaigners would target Liberals in inner city seats - such as Malcolm Turnbull, Josh Frydenberg and Kelly O'Dwyer - to put pressure on the Coalition to allow its members a free vote on the issue.

He said same-sex marriage would be legalised ''state by state and territory by territory''.

Tasmania's lower house has already passed a bill to legalise same-sex marriage, while efforts to make the change are under way in South Australia and the ACT, and the Greens have announced they will introduce gay marriage legislation in the Western Australian Parliament.

But Mr Greenwich called on supporters of gay marriage to work together. There are four separate bills to legalise gay marriage before the Federal Parliament: two sponsored by Greens and two sponsored by Labor MPs.

Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who has her own gay marriage bill before the Senate, accused Labor of a ''cynical ploy'' to push the issue off the agenda by putting it up for a vote before there was sufficient support for it to pass. She said she had invited other senators to co-sponsor her bill.



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion ... .html#ixzz26hLWGBRk

[ 本帖最后由 xblues 于 17-9-2012 14:49 编辑 ]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.examiner.com.au/story ... port-for-son/?cs=95

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
又见繁殖论............

都是异性繁殖的例子不用看远了，看近代中国就可以了，那么多异性恋猪一样的繁殖，最后只能实施强制性的控制人口，计划生育了。

可见，异性恋大多了也不是好事，而且历史已经证实了。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

其实根据调查，同性恋的比例，不论是在对同性恋宽松的西方国家还是对同性恋迫害的穆斯林国家，基本是维持不变的。
同性恋在西方国家比例高只是一个假想，因为西方国家对同性恋日渐宽松所以更多的同性恋出柜了。在中国因为对同性恋有歧视，所以大多数同性恋都隐藏性向和异性结婚了。但是他们依然被同性吸引，很多婚后在婚外找同性小三。造成很多同妻同夫的杯具！
做个比喻，你会觉得如果哪天整个社会对异性恋打压了，就会降低异性恋的比例？你就有可能转变成同性恋，对同性有感觉了？

[ 本帖最后由 choz 于 15-9-2012 23:34 编辑 ]

最后发表： black_zerg
回复内容：
这姑娘大牙一个逢，看的我好生别扭