找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 1553|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

同性婚姻州立法并不违宪

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 14-9-2012 14:27:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
Way clear for same sex marriage, says expert
Updated Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:25am AEST


                               
登录/注册后可看大图


 HOTO: Prof Williams will brief upper house MPs on constitutional aspects of same-sex marriage laws. (Reuters: Rodolfo Buhrer, file photo) RELATED STORY: First step for gay marriage lawsRELATED STORY: MLC takes on gay marriage challengeRELATED STORY: Tasmania passes gay, de facto surrogacy bill
MAP: TAS
A constitutional law expert believes there are no impediments to Tasmania legislating for same-sex marriage.




The bill is expected to be passed today in the lower house with the support of Labor and the Greens but could face a bigger hurdle when it reaches the Legislative Council next month.




Professor George Williams, from the University of New South Wales, says Tasmanian same-sex marriage laws would be constitutionally valid.




"There's no doubt that laws on marriage can be passed by the Commonwealth and the states," he said.




"The only question is whether a Tasmanian law might be inconsistent with a Federal Marriage Act.




"My own view is that it would not be inconsistent and that Tasmania has good arguments it could put in the High Court but, of course, ultimately it's something only the High Court can answer."




Prof. Williams will brief upper house MPs this morning about the Australian Constitution in respect to marriage equality.




"[I'll be] explaining that laws for marriage have been passed in Australia by the states and the Commonwealth and, in fact, the states were the only tier of government that had marriage laws until 1961 and really trying to dispel some myths in this area that might get in the way of what I think addressing the right issues in this debate," he said.




"Those issues relate to whether it is appropriate now to recognise same-sex marriage in Tasmania."
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
 楼主| 发表于 14-9-2012 14:31:13 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言
澳洲宪法规定,州可以针对联邦法律没有规定的部分,进行州法律的定制。

这个还要感谢饭桶们,因为饭桶们担心同性婚姻合法化,2004年怂恿霍华德政府,修改法律关于婚姻的定义,从而规定了【婚姻是一男一女之间的结合】。

这样那么男人和男人,女人和女人之间的结合在宪法上就没有了定义。所以目前塔斯马尼亚对同性婚姻进行州法律的定制就符合宪法。

博弈啊!
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 16-9-2012 00:36:38 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 28-11-2024 22:16 , Processed in 0.014691 second(s), 18 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表