找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 5978|回复: 42
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[以书会友] 【读书笔记】21 Lessons for the 21st Century「让我哭让我笑」

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 1-11-2018 23:37:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
Harari的新书,中文翻译为《今日简史》。我觉得和前两本的连通性没有那么强。有一些许观点在Sapiens和Homo Deus中出现过,比如:未来的大数据主义,人脑意识和智能的分离,等等。但是这本书还是有很多新观点出现。此外,这本书的结构和行文方式与前两本完全不同,推荐给大家。


About the Author
Prof. Yuval Noah Harari has a PhD in History from the University of Oxford and lectures at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, specializing in world history. His books have been translated into 50+ languages, with 12+ million copies sold worldwide. 'Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind' (2014) looked deep into our past, 'Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow' (2016) considered far-future scenarios, and '21 Lessons for the 21st Century' (2018) zoomed in on the biggest questions of the present moment.


Summary
Lesson 1 Disillusionment
During the 20th century, there were three grand stories in the world that explained the whole past and predicted the future: the fascist story, the communist story, and the libral story. However, the 21st century introduces new stories and classes, that of humans, superhumans and artificial intelligence. The simpler the story, he says, the better.


The twin revolutions in infotech and biotech will restructure not just economies and societies but our very bodies and minds. In the past we have learned to control the world outside us, in the future, we will be able to control the world inside us, which might break down.

People are sensing that the future is passing them by and are losing the faith in the liberal story. While there’s a lot of pushback against the liberal story today, Harari says that at the end of the day humankind won’t abandon the liberal story because it doesn’t have any viable alternatives.


Lesson 2 Work
The better we understand the biochemical mechanisms that underpin human emotions, desires and choices, the better computers can become in analyzing human behavior, predicting human decisions, and replacing human drivers, bankers and lawyers.


At least in some lines of work it might make sense to replace all humans with computers even if individually some humans still do a better job than machines.

Yet if these emotions and desires are in fact no more than biochemical algorithms, there is no reason computers cannot decipher these algorithms – and do so far better than any homo sapiens.


The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that in 2012, 31% of fatal crashes involved alcohol abuse, 30% speeding and 20% distracted drivers.


Self-driving vehicles have none of these flaws and eventually, we could see the displacement of 3.5 million professional truck drivers in the United States alone, amongst other driving professions.


Rather than replacing humans entirely though, AI might actually help create new human jobs. Instead of humans competing with AI they could focus on servicing and leveraging AI. The job market of 2050 is likely to be characterised by human AI cooperation rather than competition. However, the new jobs will probably demand high levels of expertise, thus, we might actually get the worst of both worlds, suffering simultaneously from high unemployment and a shortage of skilled labour.


Nobody’s life dream is to be a cashier. What we should focus on is providing for people’s basic needs and protecting the social status and self worth. Universal basic income will protect the poor against job losses and economic dislocation while protecting the rich from populist rage. Instead of giving money to people who then shop around for whatever they want the Government might subsidize free education, free healthcare, free transport and so forth. This effectively brings the communist plan to fruition, albeit not by revolution.


The problem with UBI or UBS is that human beings aren’t just built for satisfaction. Human happiness depends less on objective conditions and more on our own expectations. Our expectations adapt to changing conditions including to the condition of other people (keeping up with the Joneses). When things improve, expectations balloon and consequently even dramatic improvements in conditions might leave us as a dissatisfied as before. People need not only the basics, but they need to feel like they have enough, that their contributions are worthwhile, that they are learning and growing and that they have access to a community.


Lesson 3 Liberty
You might as well call a nationwide plebiscite to decide whether Einstein got his algebra right, all that passengers boat which runway the pilot should land. However, for better or worse, elections and referendums are not about what we think. They’re about what we feel.

Winston Churchill famously said that ‘democracy is the worst political system in the world, except for all the others’. Rightly or wrongly people might reach the same conclusions about big data to algorithms that may come to run the world. They might have lots of bugs but we have no better alternative.

The real problem with robots is not their own artificial intelligence, but rather the natual stupidity and cruelty of their human masters.

Intelligence and conciousness are very different things. Intelligence is the ability to solve problems, while conciousness is the ability to feel things such as pain, joy, love and anger. Yet if these emotions and desires are in fact no more than biochemical algorithms, there is no reason computers cannot decipher these algorithms – and do so far better than any homo sapiens.

Truth today is defined by the top results of the Google search.

On big data algorithms, once we begin to count on AI to decide what to study, where to work, and who to marry, democratic elections and free markets will make little sense.

Finance
When you apply it to your bank for a loan, it’s likely that your application is processed by an algorithm rather than a human. The bank might refuse to give you alone and you ask why and the bank replies, “algorithm said no”. You ask, “why did the algorithm say no, what’s wrong with me?” The bank replies “we don’t know, no human understands the algorithm because it is based on advanced machine learning but we trust our algorithm so we won’t give you a loan”.


Lesson 4 Equality
Those who own the data own the future.
Unlike land and machines data is everywhere and nowhere at the same time, it can move at the speed of light and you can create as many copies of it as you want. So we had better call upon our lawyers, politicians, philosophers and even poets to turn their attention to this conundrum. The key political question of our era is quite possibly, “how do you regulate the ownership of data?”


The rise of AI might eliminate the economic value and political power of most humans. At the same time, improvements in biotechnology might make it possible to translate economic inequality into biological inequality. (The super-rich might upgrade physical and cognitive abilities or even buy life itself.)


Lesson 5 Community
It is easier than ever to talk to our friends in another country but it is harder to talk to our family members over breakfast because we constantly look at our smartphones instead of at others.


Lesson 6 Civilisation
10,000 years ago, humankind was divided into countless isolated tribes where we knew no more than a few dozen people. With each passing millennium these tribes fused to larger and larger groups creating fewer and fewer distinct civilizations. In recent generations the few remaining civilizations have been blending into a single global civilization.


If you happen to be sick, it makes much less difference where you live now. You will be taken to similar-looking hospitals and the doctors will follow identical protocols and use identical tests to reach very similar diagnoses.

People care far more about their enemies than about the trade partners, says Harari. For every American film about Taiwan there are probably about 50 about Vietnam.


The people we fight most often are our family members.


What does it mean to be European in 2018? It doesn't mean to have white skin, to believe in Jesus Christ, or to uphold liberty. Rather, it means to argue vehemently about immigration, about the EU, and about the limits of capitalism and to worry about the ageing problem.


Lesson 7 Nationalism
Global problems need global answers
Unless we dramatically cut the emission of greenhouse gases in the next 20 years, average global temperatures will increase by more than two degrees celsius resulting in expanding deserts, disappearing ice caps, rising oceans and more extreme weather events such as hurricanes and typhoons.

It isn’t a coincidence that scepticism about climate change tends to be the preserve of the nationalist right, says Harari. You rarely see left wing socialists tweet that climate change is a Chinese hoax. When there is no national answer, but only a global answer to the problem of global warming, some nationalist politicians prefer to believe the problem does not exist.


To counter this, the advent of unconventional technologies might help. For example, clean meat. This might sound like science fiction but the world’s first clean hamburger was grown from cells and then eaten in 2013. It cost $330,000. Four years of research and development brought the price down to $11 per unit and within another decade, clean meat is expected to be cheaper than slaughtered meat, which can count for a lot towards ecological rejuvenation when you consider that the water footprint of beef alone is 1,800 gallons per pound of beef.


Human beings are facing three challenges: the nuclear challenge, the ecological challenge and the technological challenge.

We now have a global ecology, a global economy and global science but we are still stuck with only national politics. This mismatch prevents the political system from effectively countering a main problems. To have effective politics we must either be globalising ecology economy and the major science or we must globalise politics.


Global governance is unrealistic. Rather, to globalise politics means that political dynamics within countries give far more weight to global problems and interests.


Lesson 8 Religion
God now serves the nation
There are many good things about religions. Belief systems comfort us and bind us together. But ultimately they are all just stories to make us feel better. So it is probably not a good idea to expect religion to provide us with too much guidance about how to prepare for the future.


In order to understand the role of traditional religions in the world of the 21st Century, we need to distinguish between three types of problems:
  • Technical problems: how should farmers in arid countries deal with severe droughts caused by global warming?
  • Policy problems: what measures should government adopt to prevent global warming in the first place?
  • Identity problems: should I even care about the problems of farmers on the other side of the world?

As Karl Marx argued, religion doesn’t really have much to contribute to the great policy debates of our time.


Lesson 9 Immigration
A lot of countries are having a backlash against immigrants at a time when the economy is faltering and traditional jobs are under threat. But immigration can be a force for good, both economically and socially in helping different cultures to understand one another better.


Immigration has three basic conditions or terms.
  • The host country allows to immigrants in.
  • In return, the immigrants must embrace at least the norms and values of the host country even if that means giving up some of their traditional norms and values.
  • If they assimilate to a sufficient degree over time they become equal and full members of the host country. They become us.

Precisely because you cherish tolerance, says Harari, you can not allow too many intolerant people in. While the tolerant society can manage more liberal minorities, if the number of such extremes exceeds a certain threshold, the whole nature of society changes. If you are bringing in too many immigrants from the Middle East, you will eventually end up looking like the Middle East says Harari.

On culturists: People continue to conduct a heroic struggle against traditional racism without noticing that the battlefront has shifted from traditional racism to culturists.

The key is to find the balance between bad immigration and good immigration before everyone is either controlled by Google or wiped out by a natural disaster. This is not easy and we have not yet found the answers.


Lesson 10 Terrorism
We shouldn’t be too scared of terrorism. Far fewer people die in terrorist incidents than die of drinking fizzy drinks. And no one is scared of sugar. Since September 11, every year terrorists have killed about 50 people in the EU, about 10 people in the USA, about seven people in China and 25,000 people globally, mostly in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Syria.Diabetes and high sugar levels kill up to 3.5 million people annually while air pollution kills about seven million people.


Though if terrorists got their hands on nuclear weapons that would be a bit scary. What should worry us is if computers start global conflicts of their own accord and try to wipe us all out. Hopefully, though, we will have invented a failsafe mechanism to prevent this but no one should take anything for granted.


A successful counter terrorism struggle should be conducted on three fronts.
  • Government should focus on clandestine actions against the terror networks.
  • The media should keep things in perspective and avoid hysteria theatre. As it stands, the media obsessively report terror attacks because reports on terrorism sell newspapers much better than reports of diabetes or pollution.
  • The imagination of each and every one of us. Terrorist hold our imagination captive and use it against us. It is the responsibility of every citizen to liberate his or her imagination from the terrorists and to remind ourselves of the true dimensions of this threat.


Lesson 11 War
Today information technology and biotechnology are more important than heavy industry when it comes to war.


Today the main economic assets consist of technical and institutional knowledge rather than wheat fields, goldmines or even oil fields and you just cannot conquer knowledge through war.


Lesson 12 Humility
You are not the center of the world
Israeli Jews are educated from kindergarten to think that Judaism is the superstar of human history. People have a very hard time digesting the idea that Judaism had relatively little impact on the world as a whole.


Lesson 13 God
Morality doesn’t mean following divineties. It means reducing suffering. Hence in order to act morally you don’t need to believe in any myth or story. You just need to develop a deep appreciation of suffering. In the long run, immoral behaviour is counterproductive. You’re not likely to live in a society where strangers are constantly being raped and murdered. Not only would you be in constant danger but you would lack the benefit of trust between strangers which supports trade and economic growth among other things.


Religious belief can either create compassion in people or justify and stoke their anger especially if someone dares to insult their God ignores his wishes.


Lesson 14 Secularism
The secular code enshrines the values of truth, compassion, equality, freedom, courage and responsibility. The secular code isn’t an ideal to aspire to rather than social reality.


The most important secular commitment is to truth which is based on observation and evidence rather than on mere faith. Interestingly, Harari notes that strong belief is often required where the story isn’t true.

It is the commitment to the truth and modern science which has enabled humankind to split the atom, decipher the human genome, track the evolution of life and understand the history of humanity itself.


Finally, secular people cherish responsibility. We need not credit any divine protector with these achievements the resulting from humans developing their own knowledge and compassion. Instead of praying for miracles we need to ask what we can do to help.


As we come to make the most important decision in the history of life I personally would trust more in those who admit ignorance than those who claim infallibility. If I asked you what was the biggest mistake your religion, ideology or worldview committed, and you did not come up with something serious, I for one would not trust you.


Lesson 15 Ignorance
You know less than you think
Behavioral economists and evolutionary psychologists have demonstrated that most human decisions are based on emotional reactions and heuristics shortcuts rather than on rational analysis and that while out emotions and heuristics were perhaps suitable for dealing with life in the Stone Age they are woefully inadequate in the Silicon Age.


No individual knows everything it takes to build a cathedral and atom bomb or an aircraft. What gave homo sapiens an edge over other animals was not rationality but our unparalleled ability to think together in large groups.


Individual humans know embarrassingly little about the world and as history progressed we came to know less and less. We rely on the expertise of others for almost all our needs.


The reason we think we know a lot, even though individually we know very little, is because we treat knowledge in the minds of others as if it were our own.


Lesson 16 Justice
We all like to think we have a sense of right and wrong, but it is becoming far harder to have a natural sense of justice. Am I moral if I do nothing when there is a refugee crisis, computers are taking over the world and we are on the brink of a climate change catastrophe? Perhaps I am, perhaps I’m not.


Lesson 17 Post-truth
When one thousand people believe some made up the story for one month that’s fake news. When a billion people believe it for a thousand years that’s religion and we are admonished not to call it fake news in order not to hurt the feelings but the faithful. For better or worse, fiction is among the most effective tools in humanity’s toolkit. By bringing people together, religious creeds make large-scale human cooperation possible.


If you blame Facebook, Trump or Putin for ushering in a new and frightening era of post-truth, remind yourself that centuries ago millions of Christians locked themselves inside a self-reinforcing mythological bubble, never daring to question the factual veracity of the Bible, while millions of Muslims put their unquestioning faith in the Quran. For millennia, much of what passed for “news” and “facts” in human social networks were stories about miracles, angels, demons and witches, with bold reporters giving live coverage straight from the deepest pits of the underworld. We have zero evidence that Eve was tempted by the serpent, that the souls of all infidels burn in hell after they die, or that the creator of the universe doesn’t like it when a Brahmin marries a Dalit – yet billions of people have believed in these stories for thousands of years. Some fake news lasts forever.


Branding often involves retelling the same fictional story again and again till people become convinced it is the truth. When I say Coca-Cola, you probably think of young people enjoying it, playing sports and having fun. You probably don’t think about the overweight diabetes patients lying in hospital beds.


Lesson 18 Science fiction
In the early 21st Century, perhaps the most important artistic genre is science fiction because very few people read the latest articles in the field of machine learning or genetic engineering, but instead movies such as the Matrix and Her and TV series such as Westworld and Black Mirror shape how people understand technology and its social and economic impacts.


This also means that science fiction needs to be far more responsible in the way it depicts scientific realities otherwise it might give people with the wrong ideas or focus their attention on the wrong problems.


Perhaps the worst failing of present-day science fiction is that it attempts to confuse intelligence with consciousness. As a result it is overly concerned about a potential war between robots and humans when in fact we need to feel a conflict between a small superhuman elite. In thinking about the future of artificial intelligence, Harari says, Karl Marx is still a better guide than Steven Spielberg.


Lesson 19 Education
A thousand years ago, in 1018, there were many things people didn’t know about the future, but they were nevertheless convinced that the basic features of human society were not going to change.


In contrast, today we have no idea how China or the rest of the world will look in 2050. We don’t know what people will do for a living, we don’t know how armies or bureaucracies will function, and we don’t know what gender relations will be like. Some people will probably live much longer than today, and the human body itself might undergo an unprecedented revolution thanks to bioengineering and direct brain-computer interfaces. Much of what kids learn today will likely be irrelevant by 2050.


At present, too many schools focus on cramming information. In the past, this made sense, because the information was scarce, and even the slow trickle of existing information was repeatedly blocked by censorship. When modern schools came along, teaching every child to read and write and imparting the basic facts of geography, history, and biology, they represented an immense improvement.


Today, the last thing a teacher needs to give her pupils is more information. They already have far too much of it. Instead, people need the ability to make sense of information, to tell the difference between what is important and what is unimportant, and above all to combine many bits of information into a broad picture of the world.


Many pedagogical experts argue that schools should switch to teaching the four C’s; critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity, echoing my earlier sentiments. More broadly schools should downplay technical skills and emphasize general-purpose life skills. Most important of all will be the ability to deal with change to learn new things and to preserve your mental balance in unfamiliar situations. Again, learning how to learn, resilience and adaptability.

The best advice for today’s fifteen-year-olds is not to rely on the adults too much. Most of them mean well but they just don’t understand the world.


Lesson 20 Meaning
What will give our lives meaning in the decades and centuries ahead? So far, human history has been driven by a desire to live longer, healthier, happier lives. If science is eventually able to give that dream to most people, and large numbers of people no longer need to work in order to feed and clothe everyone, what reason will we have to get up in the morning?


Just consider the next thought that pops in your mind, where did it come from? Did you really choose to think it and only then did you think it? Certainly not.

Realising this can help us become less obsessive about our opinions feelings and desires. Humans usually give so much importance to their desires that they try to control in shape the entire world according to these desires. It is better to understand ourselves, our minds and our desires rather than try to realise whatever fantasy pops up in our heads.


It is fascinating and terrifying to behold people who spent countless hours constructing and embellishing a perfect self online, becoming attached to their creation, and mistaking it for the truth about themselves. If you could only feel what the people in the photos felt while taking them. Hence if you really want to understand yourself, you should not identify with your Facebook or Instagram account.


The Buddha taught that the three basic realities of the Universe.
  • Everything is constantly changing
  • Nothing has any enduring essence; and
  • Nothing is completely satisfied.

Suffering emerges because people fail to appreciate this. You can explore the furthest reaches of the galaxy, but you will never encounter something that does not change, the has an eternal essence, and that completely satisfies you.


According to the Buddha, life has no meaning and people don’t need to create any meaning.


Lesson 21 Meditation
Harari echoes what philosophers have been saying for millennia, that the deepest source of suffering is in the patterns of our own minds. When I want something and it doesn’t happen, my mind reacts by generating suffering. Suffering is not an objective condition in the outside world. It is a mental reaction generated by our own minds. Learning this is the first step towards seizing to generate more suffering.


Meditation is not an escape from reality. It is getting in touch with reality. Without the focus and clarity provided by this practice, Harari says he could not have written this book. He sees meditation as yet another valuable tool in the scientific talking, especially when trying to understand the human mind, which is an interesting take on conflating calm and clarity with ambition and progress.

评分

参与人数 3威望 +650 蓝宝石 +1 收起 理由
春浅 + 100 精品文章!
annahw + 50 膜拜
MICHELLE07 + 500 + 1 dimond summer

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 1-11-2018 23:53:57 | 只看该作者
hose who own the data own the future.
Unlike land and machines data is everywhere and nowhere at the same time, it can move at the speed of light and you can create as many copies of it as you want. So we had better call upon our lawyers, politicians, philosophers and even poets to turn their attention to this conundrum. The key political question of our era is quite possibly, “how do you regulate the ownership of data?”

评分

参与人数 1威望 +100 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 100 hello data owner~

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 2-11-2018 00:07:56 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 MICHELLE07 于 2-11-2018 00:10 编辑

Disillusionment 幻灭

During the 20th century, there were three grand stories in the world that explained the whole past and predicted the future: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. However, the 21st century introduces new stories and classes, that of humans, superhumans and artificial intelligence. The simpler the story, he says, the better.

20世纪三个宏大的故事,解释了过去,预测了未来:法西斯,共产主义者,自由主义者
21世纪新故事,新类别:人类,超人,人工智能
故事越简单越好


The twin revolutions in infotech and biotech will restructure not just economies and societies but our very bodies and minds. In the past we have learned to control the world outside us, in the future, we will be able to control the world inside us, which might break down.

信息技术和生物技术革命,不仅重建经济和社会秩序,也重建我们的身体和心灵。
过去我们学习如何控制身外的世界,未来,我们将能控制我们的内心世界。

People are sensing that the future is passing them by and are losing the faith in the liberal story. While there’s a lot of pushback against the liberal story today, Harari says that at the end of the day humankind won’t abandon the liberal story because it doesn’t have any viable alternatives.

人们感到被未来抛弃,对自由主义失去信心。虽然自由主义受到质疑,作者赫拉利认为自由主义最终不会被摒弃,因为它没有可行的替代品。

SUMMER,我打算一节节补上一点中文,方便阅读(非直译)。中文部分有错漏的,你来修正哦。
(我觉得自己应该看原书,但不能贪心,得专注于手上在读的书)

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
annahw + 50 很给力!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 00:10:59 | 只看该作者
MICHELLE07 发表于 2-11-2018 00:07
Disillusionment 幻灭

During the 20th century, there were three grand stories in the world that ex ...

哇 好棒! 这样方便阅读 确实更好! ~

我记下来的这些大部分还是蛮好理解的~~ 如果有个别不好理解的 我们一起来~

评分

参与人数 1威望 +100 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 100 也是为了我自己,有问题要问你哦

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 00:13:57 | 只看该作者
annahw 发表于 1-11-2018 23:53
hose who own the data own the future.
Unlike land and machines data is everywhere and nowhere at th ...

哈哈哈 未来是你的时代!

我感觉作者讨论的这个数据归属的问题 和欧洲还有美国一些州已经存在的GDPR~ 是一个意思。
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2-11-2018 09:43:44 | 只看该作者
这种高质量的帖子必须
我只能说,我只是先mark一下

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
annahw + 50 我很赞同!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 10:40:38 | 只看该作者
春浅 发表于 2-11-2018 09:43
这种高质量的帖子必须
我只能说,我只是先mark一下

哈哈哈 这里没多少是我写的 我只是搬运工而已……
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2-11-2018 12:27:34 | 只看该作者
大力Summer 发表于 2-11-2018 00:13
哈哈哈 未来是你的时代!

我感觉作者讨论的这个数据归属的问题 和欧洲还有美国一些州已经存在的GDPR~  ...

未来是你们的,我们已经老朽了,只能靠着这些句子安慰一下自己了。WWW
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2-11-2018 21:54:08 | 只看该作者
谢谢summer贴出来这本书的笔记。我没有看原文,只是读了这些要点。个人觉得作者涉及的这21个方面是些普遍存在的问题,比方移民,教育,战争,宗教。历来选举的时候这些都是讨论的焦点。我本以为作者的写作目的是想总结一下过去的情况为21世纪的发展做参考, lessons learnt。后来又觉得作者的写作目的是预测未来,从这21个方面描述一下将来的面貌。

如果是要预测未来的话,现在还在21世纪初,预测接下来的80多年应该比较困难。回想1918年的时候,一战刚结束,谁能知道还有一个二战呢?更不用说个人电脑的出现了。而作者提及的大数据,人工智能的发展也是基于目前的世界推断一下,并没有提出新的技术远景。反之,科幻小说的内容有时候脑洞更大。

技术方面的预测尚有迹可循,但是人类思想感情方面的发展,太随性了。比方说两千多来,男人好色的本性从未改变(我最近看东周列国志,深深体会到这点)。人性的一些共同弱点不是轻易能改变的,就是时尚潮流也有复古风。让机器完全代替人,如果人类已经意识到了这种事情的危机,在将来应该是不会让它发生的。世界各地经济发展不平衡,文化传统不一样,我以为完全天下大同的事应该不会发生。

这些都是我的粗浅看法,欢迎大家一起来讨论

评分

参与人数 1威望 +500 蓝宝石 +1 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 500 + 1 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 22:38:56 | 只看该作者
farmerg 发表于 2-11-2018 21:54
谢谢summer贴出来这本书的笔记。我没有看原文,只是读了这些要点。个人觉得作者涉及的这21个方面是些普遍存 ...

谢谢亲这么认真的回复!

我觉得你的角度也蛮好的~~

作者写这书出来 其实也是需要引发思考与讨论。他有很多地方也是没有给出答案的 因为他也还处在思考过程中。

你说的关于技术预测,作者并不是这个出身,说他能够预测技术的具体的应用和发展 其实蛮难的。而关于作者对于大数据和人工智能的发展的具体解释,是需要看他的第二本书 Homo Deus的~ 在这边21lessons里介绍的比较浅。他对于人类的整体的认知还是比较新颖和深刻的。比如他认为,人的大脑只是算法,人类都是处理器,人类的发展只是处理器增加,运算能力并行能力变强的过程。还有他认为未来的大数据主义,并不仅仅是目前我们认知的大数据,所以我觉得还蛮有趣的。当然他有他的局限性。如果想看这方面,我觉得《Inevitable》那本书可能更好一点。还有一本《The Third Wave》也有不同的角度。 回头我整理一下这两本的笔记发出来。

你说的男人好色的本性不变 这件事,我深有体会。我觉得人类在发展过程中,人性的很多方面都没有改变过。

我记得一个主持人问作者说:要怎么应对这些未来的问题。他说需要全球的合作。主持人继续问:那怎么合作呐?Harari说:不知道,但我知道需要合作,具体用什么方法我不知道。其中他提到了中美如何建立更好的关系和信任,也蛮有趣的。而且他说,在过去让一百万人一起关注对方的艰难进程以及过去并且完成了,那未来让五百万人一起努力,会更容易才对。这个观点我是认同的。我觉得人类总能找到方式解决这些问题。

还有啦,作者也没有提让机器完全代替人,他其实是说未来会有新的物种,机器人的出现。没有完全代替一说。

其他的我想到再补充~~





评分

参与人数 1威望 +500 蓝宝石 +1 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 500 + 1 精品文章!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

11#
发表于 2-11-2018 23:12:42 | 只看该作者
大力Summer 发表于 2-11-2018 22:38
谢谢亲这么认真的回复!

我觉得你的角度也蛮好的~~

好啊好啊,有机会另外两本的笔记也分享出来

回复  

使用道具 举报

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 23:12:46 | 只看该作者
艾玛评论也可以有蓝宝石啊~~ 哈哈哈 惊呆😮

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 50 高质量的回帖视同主题帖哦

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

13#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 23:14:30 | 只看该作者
MICHELLE07 发表于 2-11-2018 23:12
好啊好啊,有机会另外两本的笔记也分享出来

嗯 我可以po的笔记可多了 都是过去攒的货…… 够发很久的…… 还能假装自己在读书 其实没读 发以前的笔记 哈哈哈哈

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 50 以前的也是你读过的,多好啊

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2-11-2018 23:22:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢你的澄清,因为我没有看原文, 所有难免有偏颇之处,作者对人脑的认知像IT界人士😄。现在想读的书太多了,忙不过来了。欢迎你把另外两本的读后感给贴上来,我可以偷懒一下,看精华浓缩版

回复  

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 2-11-2018 23:26:04 | 只看该作者
关于全球合作,我的感觉是 合久必分 分久必合。英国脱欧和川普的America First 就是一个例子。WTO面临挑战,经济利益关系是能不能合作 如何合作的前提。美国人要的合作与中国人想的并不总是一回事
回复  

使用道具 举报

16#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 23:30:09 | 只看该作者
farmerg 发表于 2-11-2018 23:26
关于全球合作,我的感觉是 合久必分 分久必合。英国脱欧和川普的America First 就是一个例子。WTO面临挑战 ...

嗯嗯~~ 全球合作这里 主要是环境问题 技术问题和核武器问题~~ 这三个大问题的合作。

经济合作又是完全另外一回事了~~ 不过利益关系确实有可能是是否能够产生信任的基础。

政治我就完全不懂了~ 没法讨论这块 哈哈哈~~

ps 我上面说 机器人 是说的 “机器” + “人”,是基于biotechnology的, 我刚才读了一下 感觉自己表达可能出问题了。

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 50 我很赞同!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2-11-2018 23:40:58 | 只看该作者
嗯嗯 “机器+人” 取长补短,还能延年益寿。富裕人群的寿命可能会越来越长,利用biotech,医学方面的发展前景广阔。三大问题的合作 的确需要全球共识,但是政治的影响因素还是很大,毕竟是人组成的各种社会关系,这个好难把握

好像有点歪楼了

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
MICHELLE07 + 50 不歪啊,说得很好

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

18#
 楼主| 发表于 2-11-2018 23:46:51 | 只看该作者
farmerg 发表于 2-11-2018 23:40
嗯嗯 “机器+人” 取长补短,还能延年益寿。富裕人群的寿命可能会越来越长,利用biotech,医学方面的发展前 ...

嗯 你这块和作者的观点是一致的哈哈哈哈 完全没有歪楼~~
回复  

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 3-11-2018 00:53:06 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 MICHELLE07 于 3-11-2018 00:55 编辑

2. 就业

如果能更好地了解人类感情和行为模式的生物机制,就能制造出更高智能的电脑,代替高智商工种。不仅是司机,银行工作人员和律师等都将被机器取代。

有些领域可能会完全不再需要人工,即便单独来看,某些人能做得比机器更好。

如果人的感情和愿望不过是一些生化演绎,那么电脑就可以破译它们,超越智人。

无人驾驶没有醉酒,超速和走神等问题。美国的350万卡车司机最终都将失业。

人工智能并不会代替人类,它们也将创造新的工种。人不必和人工智能竞争,而是专注于服务和调控它们。 到2050年,很可能出现人和机器合作,而不是竞争的现象。但新的工种要求更强的专业性,否则我们将面临双重困境:高失业和技术工人短缺。

没人梦想做收银员。我们应该尽力满足人的基本需求,维持社会秩序和自我价值。

通用基本收入(感觉这个名词可以叫“全民补助”)是用来保障穷人经济,避免富人引起公愤的。政府不会给钱让人们随意花,而是提供免费教育,医疗,交通等。这将和平实现共产主义。

通用基本收入的问题是人类不会仅仅满足于温饱。人类的幸福更多取决于自己的期望值,而不是客观物质条件。我们的期望值会因自身条件和环境而变。
生活改善后期望膨胀,改善过猛的话甚至会导致更不幸福。

人不仅有基本需求,也希望自己拥有足够多的东西,感到自己有价值,在学习、成长,与社会建立联系。

(SUMMER的笔记篇幅比较长,我精力有限,只能写个中文大意。忍不住都同意作者的观点哈哈哈哈哈哈)

(虽然同意,但并没有看到爆炸性的思想和理论哈哈哈哈哈哈)
回复  

使用道具 举报

20#
 楼主| 发表于 3-11-2018 11:35:40 | 只看该作者
MICHELLE07 发表于 3-11-2018 00:53
2. 就业

如果能更好地了解人类感情和行为模式的生物机制,就能制造出更高智能的电脑,代替高智商工种。 ...

已经很赞啦……

嗯看来我记的东西比较多~~ 再发别的时候我再进行二次精简比较好~~ 嗯嗯
回复  

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 3-11-2018 17:31:08 | 只看该作者
大力Summer 发表于 3-11-2018 11:35
已经很赞啦……

嗯看来我记的东西比较多~~ 再发别的时候我再进行二次精简比较好~~ 嗯嗯

不用再精简,你记得非常好!再少我们就看不到什么内容。我昨天没能说服自己和某人一起读《今日简史》,只能继续来翻译。
回复  

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 3-11-2018 18:16:07 | 只看该作者
3. 自由

你可以发起全民公投来决定爱因斯坦公式是否正确。然而,投票并不代表我们所“想”,而是我们“觉得”。


丘吉尔有一句名言:“民主是最坏的制度,但其他制度更坏。“ 或对或错,人们也许会就计算机将操纵这个世界得出同样的结论。
这有缺陷,但我们别无更好的选择。

机器人真正的问题不是它们的人工智能,而是它们主人的愚蠢残酷天性。(精辟啊!)

智识很难。计算机终有一天能破译人类感情和欲望的密码。

现在,GOOGLE前排搜索结果可以定义”真相“。

一旦我们开始依赖人工智能来决定学什么,做什么工作,和谁结婚,民主选举和自由市场就失去了意义。
回复  

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 6-11-2018 00:23:54 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 MICHELLE07 于 6-11-2018 00:25 编辑

4 平等

拥有数据者拥有未来。

不同于土地和机器,数据无处不在,同时也不在何处,它能象光速一样传播,也能无限次数复制。
最好让律师,政客,哲学家甚至诗人来关注一下这个难题:
究竟该怎样规范数据的所有权?

人工智能削弱了人的经济和政治影响力,同时,生化技术的改进或将经济不平等转为生化不平等。富人也许能升级他们的体格和智识,甚至购买寿命。

(我怎么觉得这些内容我都想过?作者只是把它系统地表述出来吧?)



5. 社群


与异国的朋友交谈变得前所未有的容易,然而,在早餐时与家人交谈却变更难,因为我们不断地看手机。

(手机承载了太多功能,它不仅是与社会保持联系的工具,也是日常生活的得力助手,人们常常用到的有:看时间,查单词,地图,导航,计算器,拍照,镜子,日历,备忘录,手电,闹钟,听音乐,看视频,看书,随手记,等等等等,最后是最重要的各种CONNECTION。 在家里,捧着本纸质书,旁人看了觉得欣慰,若捧个手机呢,看同样一本书,那样子就讨人嫌。我总觉得这里面是不是有什么误解?)
回复  

使用道具 举报

24#
 楼主| 发表于 6-11-2018 00:33:24 | 只看该作者
MICHELLE07 发表于 6-11-2018 00:23
4 平等

拥有数据者拥有未来。

为勤奋的蜻蜓点赞!

我有一种 挖了坑 靠别人来继续填的 感觉 哈哈哈哈~~~~ 感谢蜻蜓填坑! 哈哈
回复  

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 6-11-2018 00:35:51 | 只看该作者
大力Summer 发表于 6-11-2018 00:33
为勤奋的蜻蜓点赞!

我有一种 挖了坑 靠别人来继续填的 感觉 哈哈哈哈~~~~ 感谢蜻蜓填坑! 哈哈

哪里哪里,是我有种得便宜的感觉,翻译比读原文轻松百倍

评分

参与人数 1威望 +50 收起 理由
大力Summer + 50 你太有才了!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

26#
发表于 8-11-2018 22:46:01 | 只看该作者
6. 文明

一万年前的人类由无数个隔离的小部落组成,每个部落不超过一打人。数千年来,这些部落融合成越来越大的族群,形成越来越少量的特色文明。到近代,遗传下来的一些文明混合成了一个单一的全球文明。

如果你病了,住在哪变得无关紧要。你会被送到相似的医院,看相似的医生,做雷同的测试,得到十分相似的诊断结果。

相比对贸易合作伙伴,人们更在乎敌人。每一部关于台湾的美国电影,就有50部关于越南的。

我们与之斗得最厉害的其实是家庭成员。

2018年对欧洲意味着什么?不是白皮肤、信基督或支持自由与否,而是关于移民,欧盟和资本主义局限的激烈争论和对老龄化问题的担忧。

(地球是个村,合作无极限。为什么说更在乎敌人?这么比喻吧,如果来了一只老虎,大家逃命,你现在要竞争的,不是老虎,而是其他人,只有跑过最慢的那个人,才有逃生的机会。)

(为什么又说最大的敌人是家人?好有道理,还是看老虎的例子吧。。。不好意思,没看原书,看摘要, PUT SOME COMMON SENSE)
回复  

使用道具 举报

27#
发表于 8-11-2018 23:26:16 | 只看该作者
7 民族主义

全球问题需要全球答案

除非我们能在未来20年内急剧降低温室效应,否则全球平均气温将提高两度,这将导致沙漠扩大,冰山消失,海平面上升,极端天气比如飓风和台风。

气候变化可能成为民族主义者的藉口。很少见到左翼社会主义者叫嚣气候问题是中国造成的。如果全球变暖问题只有全球答案,一些民族主义者会选择相信这个问题不存在。


非传统技术也许有助于解决这个问题。比如合成肉制品。这听上去像科幻。第一块由细胞合成而来的肉产于2013年,花费33万美元。通过四年的研发,价格降到了每块11美元。再过十年,合成肉有望比屠宰肉更便宜,这对恢复生态活力意义重大,鉴于每生产一磅普通牛肉就得耗费1800加仑的水。


人类面临三大挑战:核危机,生态危机,技术挑战。

我们现在拥有全球生态系统,全球经济和全球科学,但我们仍然陷于民族政治。这种失衡妨碍政治体制有效地解决主要问题。
政治必须全球化。全球共治不是不现实的。相反,全球政治意味着重心从国内政治动态转移到全球问题和利益。

(好有道理)



回复  

使用道具 举报

28#
发表于 17-11-2018 18:40:10 | 只看该作者
8. 宗教
上帝现在为国家服务.
宗教信仰有很多好处。信仰系统宽慰我们,让我们紧密联系在一起。但它们终究只是安抚人的虚构故事。所以最好别指望宗教信仰指引未来。
为了更好地理解传统宗教,得分别认识以下三个问题:
技术问题:干旱国家的农场主该怎样应对全球变暖问题引起的严重旱灾?
政策问题:政府该采用怎样的测量措施来第一时间预防全球变暖?
认知问题:我是否应该关心地球另一端农场主的问题?
马克思认为宗教对政策辩论没什么作用。
回复  

使用道具 举报

29#
发表于 17-11-2018 18:40:46 | 只看该作者
9. 移民
很多国家在经济不景气,传统就业受威胁时都抵制移民。但移民具有良好的经济和社会意义,有助于不同文化彼此了解。

移民的三个基本条件:
移入国接受移民
移民融入新国家的价值和规范,这意味着放弃一部分他们的传统价值
随着时间推移,移民充分同化,最终与移民国融为一体。

准确地说,因为你珍惜宽容,你不允许太多不宽容的人到来。宽容的社会可以管理更多的小众自由派,但如果极端分子超过一定程度,整个社会都会发生变化。如果引进太多中东移民,国家最终看起来就象中东。

文化主义:人们一直与传统种族歧视斗争,却没意识到战场已经从种族歧视转到了文化主义。
关键是在人们被GOOGLE控制或被自然灾害灭掉前,得找到一种移民系统的平衡。我们至今没有答案。

回复  

使用道具 举报

30#
发表于 17-11-2018 18:41:15 | 只看该作者
10. 恐怖主义
不必太害怕恐怖主义。死于恐怖袭击的人比死于滥饮的人少多了。没人害怕糖。911以来,全球每年死于恐怖袭击的大约25000人,其中欧洲50人,美国10人,中国7人,其他大多在伊拉克阿富汗巴基斯坦尼日利亚叙利亚。911以来,全球每年死于恐怖袭击的大约25000人,其中欧洲50人,美国10人,中国7人,其他大多在伊拉克阿富汗巴基斯坦尼日利亚叙利亚。而每年死于糖尿病的有350万人,死于环境污染的有700万人。

当然,如果恐怖分子掌握了核武器,会比较可怕。让人担忧的是电脑数据已经开始全球冲突,将清扫我们出局。破损安全装置也许能预防这个问题,但谁也说不准。
成功的反恐斗争应该包括三方面:
政府针对恐怖组织进行暗中活动
媒体不要过度报道
民众不要对恐怖活动过度想象,以免被利用
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 30-11-2024 01:13 , Processed in 0.068245 second(s), 46 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表