|
|
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言
I think the reasons provided by the positive side does not hold water at all. Let me give you the reasons one by one.
The first reason is that details of crimes can teach some persons who wanted to crime but did not know the method to crime find ways to do evil things.
If the details of crime is a text book of prime, it is the public who will get more benefit from it. In fact, it the criminals want to get some method, they have lots of ways to get it. For example, one can easily buy a novel that detailed the process of a criminal offense. Most of them does not care much about the news at all. But for the public, the media is the most common way for them to get those information.
The second reason is that details can evoke victims' painful memories about the crimes and deprive of their privacy and dignity.
That's not true. Although I'm not a psychologist, I clearly know that the victims definitely need to face what happened to them directly. Avoid talking, hearing the fact of the crime all the time will not help them get rid of the shadow of the hurt.
[quote]The third reason is that details of crime might make the criminals who wanted to have fun from the crimes feel happy and encourage them commit crimes again.
That reason is funny. It looks like the positive side has attibuted the reason of crime is the criminals what to get fun. I would say this opinion is quite harmful because it neglects the social reason of crime. Criminals are not born as criminals, they are ordinary people, they have their own dream, they are just like any of us. If we want to prevent crimes from happening, what we need do is not hiding the truth, we need probe the real social reason. |
|
[复制链接]
发表于 18-9-2010 14:47:43
收藏
赞
踩
楼主
