FreeOZ论坛

标题: ACS说他们没有新政策！ [打印本页]

作者: hanyue112 时间: 10-5-2013 16:51
标题: ACS说他们没有新政策！
在 2013-5-10，10:21，"Jade@Skills" <Jade.skills@acs.org.au> 写道：

This is not a new policy! Please liaise with DIAC in regards to points.

Thanks,

<71089c.png>
Jade@Skills
Case Officer - Assessments
D +61 (0) 2 9290 3422

E Jade.skills@acs.org.au
Level 11, 50 Carrington Street
Sydney NSW 2000
T 02 9299 3666
F 02 9299 3997
W www.acs.org.au

From: **
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013 12:11 PM
To: Jade@Skills
Subject: Re: Review application(**） for old case **

Dear Jade,

Thanks for your information, is this a new policy from MAY of 2013, or it has been existing before this month or this year?

And I am confused if I have 7 years working experience assessed with a Bachelor, then how many years are claimable to DIAC? 7 or 5? and if parts of my experience were happened before I was granted a Bachelor, that parts of the experiences are also claimable or not?

Thanks!

发自我的 iPhone

在 2013-5-10，9:20，"Jade@Skills" <Jade.skills@acs.org.au> 写道：

Hi

Thank you for your email.

We are unable to offer any pre-assessment advice. Only at the time of formal assessment by a qualified assessor will your experience be assessed against the Summary of Criteria and an assessment be made in regards to your skillled employment.

The date you meet the ACS requirements will be the date in which you will be deemed to have reached the appropriate skilled level for your nominated occupation.

Regards,

<b2a946.png>
Jade@Skills
Case Officer - Assessments
D +61 (0) 2 9290 3422

E Jade.skills@acs.org.au
Level 11, 50 Carrington Street
Sydney NSW 2000
T 02 9299 3666
F 02 9299 3997
W www.acs.org.au

****
Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013 2:38 PM
To: Jade@Skills
Subject: Re: Review application(**) for old case **

Dear Jade,

I was noted that ACS issued a new version guideline, some working experience may be deducted according to qualifications, and applicants results from MAY were already impacted. So, I want to confirm with you my review application will be applied this new policy or not as the first result letter was issued in APR.(before this change)

Thanks.

发自我的 iPhone

作者: sweetstar 时间: 10-5-2013 17:22
你问他没新政策为啥中间那句话不一样，不一样如果导致拒签，付出的经历时间金钱谁负责？

作者: hanyue112 时间: 10-5-2013 17:42
标题: 回复 #2 sweetstar 的帖子
他肯定说DIAC。我追问了，我说我就想知道你们support我claim几年。没回复呢。

作者: SummitLegal 时间: 10-5-2013 18:12
标题: 回复 #3 hanyue112 的帖子
废话，他肯定不会回答你任何关于评估本身的问题的，如果回答了你，还要评什么。
所谓新政，第一是ACS的文件写的有歧义，第二是解读的人的interpretation不好，或者说理解失误。

作者: snowborder 时间: 10-5-2013 19:12

原帖由 SummitLegal 于 10-5-2013 17:12 发表

 登录/注册后可看大图

废话，他肯定不会回答你任何关于评估本身的问题的，如果回答了你，还要评什么。
所谓新政，第一是ACS的文件写的有歧义，第二是解读的人的interpretation不好，或者说理解失误。

谢谢Summit，请问你的客户有没有那句话：从*年*月起是skilled employment？
但是确实有ACS的人回邮件说从那个时间后才算经验的。这就是您说的歧义么？

作者: hanyue112 时间: 10-5-2013 19:37
标题: 回复 #4 SummitLegal 的帖子
我付钱，他们评估，评出来的结果，我看不懂，我当然要问了。如果真评估出来是7年，然后又给我写了一个XXXX年之后算SKILLED。当然要问明白。你interpretation好，你给翻译翻译，弄个信达雅的翻译让我们看看。

作者: darrenlee 时间: 10-5-2013 19:58
为啥火气都上来了
谁有实际案例说说到底移民局是不是还按原来标准加分,这才是证据嘛,我们解读有啥用
要不直接问问移民局?

作者: audreybest 时间: 10-5-2013 21:09
这事得问移民局

作者: wbe2008 时间: 12-5-2013 17:26
世上本无路，走的人多了便成了路。会不会我们自己过度解读，反过来提醒了移民局还有这么一出。

作者: snowborder 时间: 12-5-2013 23:01

原帖由 wbe2008 于 12-5-2013 16:26 发表

 登录/注册后可看大图

世上本无路，走的人多了便成了路。会不会我们自己过度解读，反过来提醒了移民局还有这么一出。

有可能

欢迎光临 FreeOZ论坛 (https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/)