One country’ road systems usually require a large sum of money, especially when there are an increasing number of automobiles. While some people think that the government should pay for the road expense(政府应该承担“过路费”吗？应该是建设维护费吧),(.) I personally believe that individuals should share the responsibility with the government.
If the government takes the sole responsibility in maintaining the road systems, it can certainly ensure that they are well-managed and function smoothly. (我觉得政府就应该全盘承担公路的maintainence等。公路的使用者交过路费。) Government’s operation is more likely to improve the road facilities and make(makes) sure that they all meet the safety requirement, which is crucial to citizens’ well-being. This is especially true in developed countries, where government(governments) tends(tend) to emphasizes(emphasize) social infrastructure and have more advanced management experience.
On the other hand, if the users pay (for) all the road expense, the government can surely spare the extra money and energy on(for?) improving the overall public well-being. (其实我觉得改造交通的政府预算是专款专用的，不会因为用户交钱就shift到其他福祉中去。文中说法好像不太合理。) It is because the fact that individual’s participation can fill funding gaps, thereby easing the burden on authorities. When the road systems are financially taken good care of by the public, the government therefore can spend extra money on other areas such as education or health care,
In my opinion, I think that the road users should share the responsibility with the government. If individuals, along with the government can make a joint effort, it can make sure the capitals and resources invested in road systems adequate. And the road systems can be carefully maintained, effectively operated and frequently updated ('road system can be frequently updated'? sounds weird).
In conclusion, I believe that the country can benefit economically (from sth) if individuals and government can both take the initiative to take care of the road systems.
