邻居同人 今日: 0|主题: 1704|排名: 30 

最后发表： black_zerg
回复内容：
这姑娘大牙一个逢，看的我好生别扭

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
因为桶泥也知道自己的想法不占主流，万一让良心投票，他就失控。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and Fox News.

[youtube]_TBd-UCwVAY[/youtube]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
我经常在FreeOZ发一些关于同性恋平权运动的帖子，遭到很多人的非议，认为我是在强奸众人眼球。在辩论中，很多人多提到大多数人利益和民主。

辩论中发现，FreeOZ的民主，和很多上FreeOZ的人一直高喊民主，却丝毫不知道什么才是民主，或者对民主的意识还停留在自我意识的那种狭隘的民主。请看下面关于民主的解释：

The greatest challenge for democracies is not so much in how well they look after the majority, but in how well they are able to protect the rights and recognise the aspirations of individuals and small minorities.

即：民主的挑战和意义不在于如何保证大多数人的利益，而在于如何保护少数人和作为个体的每个人的合法权益。

http://citynews.com.au/2012/christian-soldier-comes-a-cropper/

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
If proud Americans can be who they are and boldly stand at the altar with who they love then surely, surely we can give everyone in this country a fair chance at that great American Dream.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  感觉印第安人更好一些。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/whereyourmpstands/

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Brad Pitt Backs Obama: 'Gay Marriage Is Inevitable'

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/brad-pitt-obama-gay-marriage-_n_1870712.html?1347291112&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

Brad Pitt and his mother clearly have different political views.
In an interview with The Telegraph, the "Moneyball" star lent his support to Barack Obama, noting the president's controversial backing of same-sex marriage.
"I am an Obama supporter and I’m backing his election campaign,” Pitt said at a screening of his forthcoming film "Killing Them Softly" in London. “Gay marriage is inevitable. The next generation, they get it. It is just a matter of time before it becomes a reality.”
The gay-friendly leading man's comments follow those of his conservative mother Jane, who backed Mitt Romney ina controversial letter to Missouri's Springfield News-Leader in July.
"Any Christian who does not vote or writes in a name is casting a vote for Romney’s opponent, Barack Hussein Obama -- a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer, and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage," Jane wrote in her letter.
Jane's letter was penned in response to that of another reader, who argued, "Traditional Christians believe in gender equality. They believe Mormon theology denigrates women."
This isn't the first time the 48-year-old Pitt has spoken out in favor of marriage equality. "No state should decide who can marry and who cannot," Brad is quoted byPeople magazine as saying last year. "Thanks to the tireless work of so many, someday soon this discrimination will end and every American will be able to enjoy their equal right to marriage."

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
强烈支持。澳洲我支持吉拉德。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
&w=250&h=180&zc=1&q=90

GP banned after prescribing gay “cure”

Posted on 10 September 2012

More Sharing ServicesShare | Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print

A NSW doctor belonging to the Exclusive Brethren religious sect has been banned from practising as a GP after prescribing chemical castration as a “cure” for homosexuality.
Mark Christopher James Craddock prescribed an 18-year-old man anti-androgen therapy cyproterone acetate (Cyprostat) when he approached Craddock in 2008 seeking a treatment for being gay.
The patient, who cannot be named for legal reasons, complained to the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission earlier this year before it was sent to the Medical Council of NSW.
A council hearing held last month was told the young man came out as gay in 2008 and was told by a Exclusive Brethren leader that “there’s medication you can go on for these things”. The leader then referred him on to Craddock.
The young man, who was visiting Australia at the time from New Zealand on a working holiday, was staying with a member of the Exclusive Brethren Church who helped facilitate the appointment with Craddock and drove him to Craddock’s home.
Craddock then saw the man in his home and prescribed the drug which lowers the libido and is used for treating prostate cancer victims and for sexual deviancy.
The Medical Council found that Craddock did not make a proper physical psychologist nor did he discuss the side effects of the drug, which includes impotence in some cases.
Craddock admitted that it was a mistake to prescribe so much medication with out proper checks prior and said the drug should not have been prescribed.
He was found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct and was restricted to only practicing as a radiologist with restrictions on prescriptions he could write for patients outside that field except in emergency situations.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Marriage equality advocates believe the reform would pass if the Coalition had a conscience vote.

The claim comes as Liberal front-bencher, Malcolm Turnbull, re-iterated his in-principle support for equality but declared it would not pass even if he and other Coalition members were allowed a conscience vote.

Australian Marriage Equality national convener, Alex Greenwich said,

“If there was a Coalition conscience vote, more Coalition MPs would be seeking out the views of their constituents, seriously considering the case for reform, and generally opening their hearts and minds to the need for change”.

“We implore Mr Abbott to abide by Coalition tradition and allow a conscience vote on a reform that has majority support across the Australian community.”

“Rather than breaking a Coalition tradition and forcing his members to vote as a collective, Mr Abbott should allow Liberals to vote according to their own conscience and the views of their electorate” Mr Greenwich said.

Today in Parliament Mr Turnbull said: “Were a free vote to be permitted, I could support legislation that would recognise same-sex couples as married.”

Mr Turnbull went on to say he would support civil unions, despite his own polling showing most people in his electorate oppose them, and despite Tony Abbott ruling them out as an option both at the last election and more recently.

Mr Greenwich said it will be hypocritical of Coalition MPs like Mr Turnbull to be allowed to vote for civil unions and not for marriage equality.

“Either MPs like Malcolm Turnbull are allowed a conscience vote on both marriage equality and civil unions or neither.”

“For Mr Turnbull to be allowed to vote to entrench discrimination through a civil union scheme but prohibited from voting for full equality through an amendment to the Marriage Act is an insult to the majority of Australians who support marriage equality.”

Mr Greenwich said civil unions are a second-class form of recognition which have proven to be ‘a failed experiment‘ in countries like New Zealand and the UK which are now moving towards marriage equality instead.

For more information contact Alex Greenwich on 0421 316 335

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
我已经在Change.org 签名了，我负责FreeOZ上的饭桶们！

很多饭桶的共同特点是：自己意识不到自己是饭桶，需要加强关于饭桶知识普及教育！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
这一集很精彩。
[youtube]vBXJbVT638c[/youtube]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
挺好看的，主角是一个印度阿三医生，谁说阿三不帅啊。

[youtube]UWnTLMD_t1w[/youtube]
[youtube]P6GbAvyY-Z0[/youtube]
[youtube]vSQTUJ0iR-c[/youtube]
[youtube]_ZmY_UXP4mA[/youtube]
[youtube]d1eW55XHLOo[/youtube]

最后发表： katsura
回复内容：
This mother is PROUD of her son for standing up to bullies, I would imaging a good number of Chinese parents will say to their kid:
"Don't be so stupid and stand up for others, what do you get from this? Keep your head down and avoid trouble." That's why there's a prevailing slave mentality amongst some Chinese.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
很多有都有过忧郁期，同性恋人由于遭受社会的偏见和歧视，遭受忧郁困扰的比较普遍。有可能持续几年，几十年，一生。消除社会偏见和培养自身的强大心理都很重要。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
I've also been vocal as hell about the issue of gay marriage so you can take your "I know of no other NFL player who has done what Mr. Ayanbadejo is doing" and shove it in your close-minded, totally lacking in empathy piehole and choke on it. Asshole.

这句话我在FreeOZ上也经常遇到啊。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：


解释不解释，怎么解释要看你了，你是怎么给你家孩子解释公主和王子到底干嘛的呢？被一提到同性恋你就想到性交，理智一点行不行？

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/why-the-acl-are-dangerous/

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4248444.html

最后发表： katsura
回复内容：

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
维基百科，自由的百科全书
自1979年伊朗伊斯兰革命以后，伊朗采取了强硬的措施来杜绝同性恋现象。根据《伊斯兰法》，同性恋的行为是非法和有罪的。不過，對於男同性戀行為及女同性戀行為，伊朗的法律卻有不對等程度的懲罰。
目录  [隐藏]
1 男同性戀行為
2 女同性戀行為
3 参见
4 参考资料
5 外部連結
[编辑]男同性戀行為

在伊朗，男同性戀行為會根據沙里亞法規來處罰。根据伊朗的《刑法》110条，同性恋是非法的。成年的男同性戀行為的违法者会面临死刑的处决，而未成年的亦會受到74次鞭打。有报告指出，在伊朗，常用来处死同性恋者的刑法包括绞刑、砍头和石刑。甚至一些很小的犯罪行为也会引致严重的刑法，例如触摸大腿会受到100次鞭打，而重复触犯四次将会面临死刑的惩处。
2005年，伊朗以绞刑处死两名未成年男子的做法引发国际社会的强烈反应。伊朗当局声称这两名男子（Mahmoud Asgari和Ayaz Marhoni）有同性性行为并且强奸了另外一个男孩。但是，这些指控一直到事件引发国际关注之后才提出来，使得有人相信伊朗当局的这个举动是为了减少人们对这两名男子被处死的同情。[1][2]
[编辑]女同性戀行為

相對於對男同性戀者的懲罰，女同性戀行為的懲罰相對較輕。對於初犯的成人，会受到100次鞭打；但若有關犯人被處罰三次，第四次時會被判處死刑(見《刑法》127, 129, 130条)。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
If women could be dragged to jail for seeking the vote... if a generation could defeat a depression, and define greatness for all time... if a young preacher could lift us to the mountaintop with his righteous dream... and if proud Americans can be who they are and boldly stand at the altar with who they love... then surely, surely we can give everyone in this country a fair chance at that great American Dream.

-- Michelle Obama, First Lady


Have a gay day.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
开头好看，越看越难看，我不转了，愿意看的同学自己顺着链接看吧。
有一次证明，我不看中文小说是有原因的，这个民族的文化欠X!@

[ 本帖最后由 xblues 于 6-9-2012 02:31 编辑 ]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Straight People: Gay People Need Protection From Harm & Your Vote for Obama

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/to ... dlinkusaolp00000009

"ersecution of people because of their sexual orientation ... is every bit as unjust as that crime against humanity, apartheid."
--Desmond Tutu, 2004

LGBT discrimination is not simply a cultural or religious option as some maintain, because it causes serious harm to LGBT people who share this earth and deserve safe haven. This idea, that we all deserve to be safe and secure in our being, is the very foundation of the social compact by which we collectively form governments for self-rule. This is the same principle underpinning religious freedom and a universally accepted concept that mandates government protection from harm by others, particularly status-based. And make no mistake about it: homophobia kills and maims in horrific ways and the science is starting to show it.

Unfortunately, for too long and for complex reasons, the conversation about LGBT equality has failed to pointedly demonstrate the harm anti-gay social norms, laws and rhetoric cause. And in so doing, that advocacy has foregone the inescapable public policy argument that: because of the harm inflicted, it is the duty of the government to actively outlaw discrimination to protect roughly twenty million LGBT American children and adults from what is effectively societal abuse. Fortunately, Obama understands this, and has done amazing things already, but he needs your vote to further advance this urgent humanitarian mission.

The statistics on how discrimination affects LGBT people are still fledgling, but clear.

-        LGBT people are six times more likely to have multiple mental health disorders due to discrimination such as depression, general anxiety, conduct disorder and alcohol/substance disorder, all at much higher rates. -        41% of transgender people attempt suicide, and overall LGBT are roughly 4 times as likely, with 33% of all youth suicides being LGBT children.
-        LGBT youth are still rejected by their families, some because their parents fear they will be pedophiles threatening their siblings, a terrible false stereotype, and are thus, roughly 40% of all homeless youth, 73% of those rejected by their own parents and 8 times as likely to attempt suicide.

-        Violence directed against LGBT people is vicious and increasing. 61% of students feel unsafe at school, with almost 20% assaulted (punched, kicked or injured with a weapon), causing missed school and lower grades.

-        In employment, studies show massive discrimination in federal, state and private sectors, with 44% of LGB and 66% of transgender people being fired or not hired, or enduring steady fear, harassment, lower earnings and unfair scrutiny.

-        Gay people face housing discrimination at 30% in one study, though more information is needed.

-        There is widespread police abuse, including profiling, selective enforcement, and physical, verbal and sexual abuse in detention.

-        Elected officials are openly hostile in all 50 states; and the RNC 2012 platform calls for banning same-sex marriage by constitutional amendment. Correspondingly, in states with no discrimination protections, LGBT people are 5x more likely to have two or more mental disorders, and that increases by 1/3 in states with anti-gay referendum.

-        Finally, same-sex couples are denied the benefits and rights of marriage in over 40 states and at the federal level, creating uncertainty at the very fabric of most people's lives: the family. And the list goes on.

These horrific facts, which still woefully fail to capture the true nature of the daily interpersonal and internal emotional difficulties, are increasingly the tool of advocacy, particularly in the bullying realm. But the total picture is still buried, because in part, it paints an unflattering picture of LGBT people and feeds a horrible chapter in the annals of gay stigmatization, which previously held that homosexuality itself was a mental illness. This long-revoked and reversed designation by the American Psychological Association nevertheless remains the basis of cultural oppression, a basis of homophobia itself, inescapable by its victims and obvious in the oppressors sense of entitlement. And so the harm persists, with its perpetrators defiantly justifying their position, mostly on religious grounds, and the victims afraid to tell the truth of their suffering, even for their own liberation. This is the power of discrimination.

Hopefully, however, with the harm increasingly revealed, opponents will take note that their advocacy against LGBT equality is abuse in and of itself. And they will relinquish the flipside argument that religious people are somehow harmed, or their religious freedom somehow inappropriately infringed upon by LGBT equality. Yes, there may be some ways in which the current expanse of religion into the public sphere is affected, but this is inherent in the intersectional nature of freedom, which holds that one person's freedom ends where the other person's freedom begins. This idea is equally essential to our social compact because it carves out a realm of mutual respect - a sharing of space - by the accommodation of all parties to the freedom of one another. This is why governments are expressly secular, to avoid one religious group imposing on the free space of others, and why this social construct applies directly to non-discrimination protections for LGBT people in the public sphere, the realm where we must respect all religions, and where religions must respect all of us, period.

Sadly, since too few groups tell the story of how discrimination impacts the communal and individual psychology, LGBT Americans themselves often do not realize that their life's struggle is due in large part to discrimination. They may be suffering individually, unable to form relationships or careers, hypervigilant as abused children are, or battling depression, barely warding off suicide. But because they don't understand how social oppression affects individuals, they do not think of themselves as oppressed and they do not seek to change the broader situation, like victims of a mass frontal attack might for example. So very few participate in their own political movement, either assuming their suffering is a character trait to be overcome, or simply aware there is very little they can actually do about it. Either way, in a recent Harris poll commissioned by LOGO only 9% of LGBT respondents felt "gay rights in general" was most important in the 2012 election, trumped by the economy, jobs and unemployment, like most Americans. And yet their suffering continues, unabated, most unaware of the cause, and those that are, too few to change it.

Fortunately, President Obama has arrived like a true knight in shining armor, a constitutional law professor, a black man, a product of civil rights, and an international human rights champion. He has boldly instituted a shift in federal policy that has finally acknowledged the human rights obligation to protect LGBT people across the globe and at home. His record is too long to restate, but there is one undeniable truth: Barack Obama understands the insidious nature of discrimination that denies the soul safe passage, and is fulfilling his duty to protect as President. From Pride events at the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, to United Nations Resolutions, to repeal of DADT and the appointment of the first lesbian to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, he has laid the course.

But he cannot do this alone or in one term. He needs the support of compassionate Americans who understand our collective responsibility to protect LGBT Americans. He needs Republican fathers and Independent cousins with gay friends and family. He needs clergy and civil rights activists alike. And he needs support from every American who truly believes in the ideals of equality and justice for all, but has stood on the sidelines in this last great civil rights battle of our age not knowing how to help. Now you do.

As it stands, the LGBT community has mostly been left to fend for itself over the last century, though it has made a valiant go of it claiming control of its destiny. It has propelled itself into mainstream acceptance from the bowels of human rejection, and created a real opportunity for equality and liberation. Culturally, there is Rachel Maddow, Anderson Cooper and Ellen. And politically, there are new campaigns by Lady Gaga and Oprah, Cyndi Lauper, and hundreds of dedicated groups and activists.

But there is no concerted quest for full federal legal protection to guard them comprehensively from discrimination - nor a plan to secure it any time soon. LGBT people simply do not have the political power or engagement it takes to even hope for such a goal, particularly if they have to go it alone. So it is time for the conscientious among you with real power to take the reins, like Obama has, and the individuals out there to take a stand for those in need.

And at this critical moment, we need Obama and we need your vote. To help end our plight, vote for Equality 2012 by voting Democrat down the line, or just for Obama, just this once. This election is still about hope for LGBT Americans, and President Obama still offers that hope.

Amnesty International '05: "The US has fallen behind many other countries in the legal recognition of the basic human rights of LGBT people."

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Bully，翻译成凌辱和暴力，比如校园暴力，工作环境中的歧视，甚至网络上的语言暴力都是Bully
本周五，9月7日是anti bully 日，请大家都穿紫色的衣服，以表示你支持反暴力的立场！

最后发表： hueofwind
回复内容：
我一贯无视共和党的。

最后发表： chubbycat
回复内容：
dcxg's positive comments please

最后发表： chubbycat
回复内容：


so does dcxg!!!

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
我和很多典型的同性恋一样，都是纳税大户，很少能够领到什么政府补助或者什么抵税的。而可以想象，等我老了，就是需要政府照顾的时候，由于社会的偏见，以及很多同性恋没有子女和伴侣，老龄同性恋对面临着很多特殊的社会问题。需要特殊照顾。目前澳洲刚刚通过了给老龄同性恋人的拨款。

反对党这个说法很不负责任。工党虽然不完美，但是反对党更差，所以选举只能选择绿党或者工党。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
不堪骚扰  
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032483-1-1.html

（投票）因为Xblues的言论而对同性恋改变看法的有多少
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032628-1-1.html

要么把FREEOZ变成同性恋网站，要么限制虫子使用FREEOZ网站？
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032131-1-1.html

尊重科学，尊重基因导致的同性，呼吁公开化合法化
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032335-1-1.html

我为同人邻居献一策：非暴戾求合作  
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032482-1-1.html

呼吁正常对待同性恋话题，良性竞争
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032525-1-1.html

投诉Xblue以及其马甲Ifas - new episode  
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1032045-1-1.html

What reason, right does 鹰扬天下 have, to block and edit my post
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1030765-1-1.html

关于freeoz
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1031957-1-2.html

投诉Xblue以及其马甲Ifas
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1031744-1-2.html

和虫子沟通一句
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1031534-1-2.html

控告“鹰扬天下”乱用权利
https://www.freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1031917-1-2.html

最后发表： chubbycat
回复内容：

最后发表： katsura
回复内容：


Maybe that YingYang admin wrote this book.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
上帝啊，救救这些饭桶吧，愿主赐予他们同性恋的孩子，给他们重新做人的一个机会！

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
我觉得是他最后一轮的选歌失误。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：