这句话很吓人,有具体的出处吗?175签证能从每年10万减少到0?移民局的政策变动难道每次都是推倒重建?作者: freeaust 时间: 13-12-2009 01:38 作者: 天行健 时间: 13-12-2009 01:52 标题: 回复 #10 dark008 的帖子 Targets applicants (including in the Independent category) with skills of high economic value and in the numbers required by the labour market;
•
Selects skilled migrants on the basis of those who score the highest rather than those who simply meet the prescribed pass mark;
•
Changes the relationship between the lodgement of an application and the legal obligation to grant a visa, thereby eliminating long and costly visa application pipelines;
•
Is agile and responsive to decisions to increase or decrease the size of the permanent migration program; and
•
Complements the `demand-driven’ employer sponsored visa categories
This will mean that there will no longer be any certainty of gaining your visa just because you lodged your application. There is also the possibility DIAC may retrospectively apply these changes to those students already waiting for their residency on bridging visas.
从以上变化可以看出:即使你申请了签证,同时符合申请时候所有法律要求,也不再意味着你一定可以获得永久居民签证。同时,移民局也可能清除那些已经拥有过桥签证正在等待审理的签证申请人
怎么看出来 “纯粹的“独立”技术移民肯定是死了” 呢?
只说会有个“a reduction in unsponsored general skilled migrants”
而且最后一页“Targets applicants (including in the Independent category) with skills of
high economic value and in the numbers required by the labour market”
如果以前那两个issues没有被颠覆,我觉得这个planning正好应证了其中关于什么长期需求靠独立技术移民,而短期需求靠临签这样的论述作者: cofeedog 时间: 13-12-2009 23:53
技术移民封死是纯扯,独立技术移民封死同样纯扯作者: 天行健 时间: 14-12-2009 00:11